This prospective randomized clinical trial compared two arthroscopic techniques for repairing partial-thickness articular-side rotator cuff tears: transtendon repair and conversion repair. Eligible patients with symptomatic tears exceeding 50% of tendon thickness, confirmed by MRI and intraoperative assessment, were randomly assigned to either repair technique. Functional outcomes, range of motion, complications, and MRI healing were assessed up to 24 months postoperatively
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
54
Patients undergo arthroscopic conversion repair, where the partial-thickness tear is converted to a full-thickness tear and repaired using standard arthroscopic techniques.
Patients undergo arthroscopic transtendon repair, preserving the intact bursal surface of the tendon while repairing the articular-side defect using suture anchors.
Kasr Alainy
Cairo, Egypt
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score
Time frame: Baseline and 24 months postoperatively
Constant-Murley Score (CMS)
Time frame: Baseline and 24 months postoperatively
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain
Time frame: Baseline and 24 months postoperatively
Range of Motion (ROM)
Measure the range of: 1. Forward flexion 2. Abduction 3. External rotation 4. Internal rotation
Time frame: Preoperative and 24 months postoperatively.
Complication Rate
Number of cases with: Stiffness Persistent pain Infection
Time frame: Up to 24 months postoperatively
MRI Healing Status
Number of cases with complete healing in MRI
Time frame: 12 months postoperatively
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.