This cross-sectional observational study investigates the association between changes in olfactory and gustatory senses and hedonic hunger among individuals who have undergone bariatric surgery. The study also examines the effects of these sensory changes on diet quality and anthropometric measurements. Participants completed a structured questionnaire including sociodemographic and health information, dietary habits, a modified 33-item taste and smell assessment, the Power of Food Scale (PFS), the Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS), the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), and anthropometric measurements.
Obesity is a chronic, multifactorial disease that negatively impacts health and quality of life. Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment option for severe obesity, leading to significant and sustained weight loss as well as improvement in obesity-related comorbidities. Postoperative changes in taste and smell perception are frequently reported by bariatric patients and may influence food preferences, hedonic hunger, and overall diet quality. These sensory alterations can result from anatomical and hormonal changes after surgery, including altered gut hormone secretion (e.g., PYY, GLP-1, ghrelin) and bile acid metabolism, which affect appetite regulation and reward pathways. This cross-sectional observational study evaluated adults aged 18-65 years who had undergone sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) at least three months prior to enrollment. Data collection included sociodemographic and health information, dietary habits, a modified 33-item taste and smell questionnaire, the Power of Food Scale (PFS) to assess hedonic hunger, the Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS), the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), and anthropometric measurements. Nutrient intakes were analyzed according to the Türkiye Nutrition Guide (TÜBER-2022) reference values. The primary objective was to determine the relationship between postoperative taste/smell changes and hedonic hunger. Secondary objectives included assessing the association between sensory perception and Mediterranean diet adherence, anthropometric parameters, and nutrient adequacy by surgery type. Findings from this study may guide the development of personalized nutritional follow-up protocols to improve long-term outcomes in bariatric patients.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
101
Participants who have undergone sleeve gastrectomy ≥3 months prior to study enrollment; and Participants who have undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass ≥3 months prior to study enrollment.
Istanbul University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism
Istanbul, Capa, Turkey (Türkiye)
Power of Food Scale (PFS) Score
Hedonic hunger assessed using the Power of Food Scale (range: 1-5; higher scores indicate greater hedonic hunger).
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, at study enrollment)
Modified 33-item Taste and Smell Questionnaire Score
Changes in taste and smell perception assessed using a modified 33-item questionnaire (range: 0-33; higher scores indicate more pronounced sensory changes).
Time frame: Baseline (≥3 months after bariatric surgery, at study enrollment)
Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS) Score
Adherence to the Mediterranean diet assessed using the 14-item MEDAS questionnaire (range: 0-14; higher scores indicate greater adherence).
Time frame: Baseline (≥3 months after bariatric surgery, at study enrollment)
Body Mass Index (BMI)
BMI calculated as weight (kg) / height (m²).
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, at study enrollment)
Waist-to-Hip Ratio (WHR)
WHR calculated as waist circumference (cm) / hip circumference (cm).
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, at study enrollment)
Energy Intake Adequacy (% of TÜBER-2022 reference)
Daily energy intake adequacy compared to TÜBER-2022 reference values.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, at study enrollment)
Protein Intake Adequacy (% of TÜBER-2022 reference)
Daily protein intake adequacy compared to TÜBER-2022 reference values.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, at study enrollment)
Micronutrient Intake Adequacy (e.g., iron, folate, vitamin E; % of TÜBER-2022 reference)
Micronutrient intake adequacy compared to TÜBER-2022 reference values.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, at study enrollment)
Nutrient Adequacy Score (based on TÜBER-2022 reference values)
Composite score reflecting the percentage adequacy of daily energy, macronutrient, and micronutrient intakes compared to TÜBER-2022 reference values. Higher scores indicate greater adequacy.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, at study enrollment)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.