The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if using FoundationDRS Solo improves healing of chronic, non-healing foot ulcers in diabetic patients. The main question that this study aims to answer is: Does FoundationDRS Solo, when used in conjunction with standard of care wound management techniques, result in a higher percentage of target ulcers achieving complete closure (i.e. healing) as compared to ulcers being treated with standard of care alone after 12 weeks of treatment. One ulcer on each participant's foot will receive weekly applications of 1) FoundationDRS Solo and standard of care wound management or 2) standard of care wound management alone. Pictures of the ulcer and measurements of its size will be measured every week to track its healing progress over a total treatment period of 12 weeks. Additionally, the participants will be asked to fill out a questionnaire about the wound impacts their life and their quality of life.
Patients with diabetes often develop ulcers on their lower extremities. While some ulcers can be managed using standard of care wound management techniques including debridement, moist dressings, infection control and off-loading, many develop into chronic, non-healing wounds. Chronic non-healing wounds can lead to higher risk of infection, amputation and decreased quality of life. Advanced wound therapies aim to promote rapid and complete healing of chronic wounds. Examples of an advanced wound therapies include scaffolds that contain and / or mimic the structure and function of the natural extracellular matrix of tissue. Several biomimetic scaffolds have been cleared for the management of a variety of wounds (including DFU's) by the US FDA. The focus of this clinical trial is to determine the clinical utility of treating diabetic foot ulcers with weekly applications of FoundationDRS Solo in addition to standard of care wound management techniques compared to applying standard of care wound management only. It is hypothesized that the addition of FoundationDRS Solo to standard of care treatment will result in a higher percentage of ulcers achieving complete closure (i.e. healing) compared to ulcer being treated with standard of care alone after 12 weeks of treatment. To test this hypothesis the study will consist of patients who will undergo standard of care for 4-weeks prior to entering a 12-week treatment phase. During the 4-week standard of care phase, patients meeting inclusion criteria (including confirmation that ulcer does not reduce in area by more than 45%) will be randomized into the treatment groups. During the 12-week treatment phase, index wounds will be treated weekly with FoundationDRS Solo and standard of care or standard of care alone. Evaluation of data (outcome measures) associated with the trial will include intent to treat and per protocol analyses which will be performed by at least one blinded statistician and investigator.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
124
FoundationDRS Solo is a porous, degradable composite scaffold composed of chitosan and chondroitin sulfate
Standard of care (SOC) will include cleansing of the index wound with sterile normal saline solution, followed by sharp debridement to remove necrotic tissue, application of appropriate dressings and wound off-loading
Incidence of Complete Wound Closure
The percentage of wounds completely healed. Complete healing will be defined as 100% epithelialization without drainage and need for dressing or wound size ≤ 0.1cm\^2 as determined by the site investigator and validated by a blinded review board.
Time frame: 12-weeks following study screening phase
Time to wound closure
Time to wound closure over 12 weeks will be determined via a Kaplan-Meier analysis
Time frame: 12-weeks following study screening phase
Percent reduction in wound area
Percent reduction of wound area \[(Ai-Axw\]) / Ai\] x100, where Ai is the area of the index wound at randomization, Axw is the wound area at weekly intervals.
Time frame: 12-weeks following study screening phase
Adverse Events
A symptom, sign, illness or experience that develops or worsens in severity during the course of the study. Intercurrent illnesses or injuries will be regarded as adverse events. Abnormal results of laboratory or diagnostic procedures are considered to be adverse events if the abnormality: Leads to study withdrawal. Is associated with a serious adverse event. Is associated with clinical signs or symptoms. Leads to additional treatment or to further diagnostic tests. Is considered by the Investigator to be of clinical significance
Time frame: 12-weeks following study screening phase
Forgotten Wound Score
The forgotten wound score is on a range from 0 to 100, with the higher score indicating a high degree of "forgetting" the wound.
Time frame: 12-weeks following study screening phase
Wound Quality of life (Wound-QoL) questionnaire
Average scores will range from 0 (lowest score) to 4 (highest score), with a higher score indicating that the wound effected the subject's quality of life more severely.
Time frame: 12-weeks following study screening phase
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.