This study aimed to investigate the relationship between Type D personality traits, somatization disorder, and perceived social support in individuals diagnosed with temporomandibular joint disorders. Temporomandibular joint disorders are musculoskeletal and neuromuscular conditions that affect the jaw joint, chewing muscles, and related structures, leading to pain and functional difficulties. Psychological and social factors, such as personality traits and emotional distress, have been shown to influence the development and persistence of these disorders. The research was conducted as a prospective cross-sectional study between February and June 2025 in Gaziantep City Hospital. Adult participants between 18 and 65 years of age who were diagnosed with temporomandibular joint disorders were compared with healthy individuals of similar age and gender. Participants completed validated questionnaires that assessed mandibular function, anxiety and depression symptoms, Type D personality traits, somatization tendencies, and levels of perceived social support. The purpose of this study was to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the psychological and social dimensions that may contribute to the onset and course of temporomandibular joint disorders.
This research was designed as a prospective cross-sectional study conducted between February 2025 and June 2025 in the Otorhinolaryngology outpatient clinic of Gaziantep City Hospital, Turkey. The study included two groups: patients diagnosed with temporomandibular joint disorders and healthy control participants matched for age and gender. All participants were between 18 and 65 years of age, literate, cognitively intact, and voluntarily agreed to participate. Ethical approval was granted by the institutional ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all individuals before enrollment. Data collection involved face-to-face interviews using standardized self-report questionnaires. The following instruments were used: 1. \*\*Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire:\*\* This instrument includes 17 questions that evaluate functional problems of the jaw during daily activities. Each question is scored on a five-point scale, and higher total scores indicate greater impairment in jaw function. 2. \*\*Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale:\*\* This tool consists of 14 questions that measure symptoms of anxiety and depression. It has two parts, each containing seven questions. Each section produces a total score between zero and twenty-one, where higher values represent greater symptom severity. 3. \*\*Type D Personality Scale:\*\* This scale contains fourteen statements divided into two categories: negative emotions and social inhibition. Each statement is rated on a five-point scale from zero to four. A score of ten or more on both categories indicates the presence of Type D personality traits. 4. \*\*Somatization Scale:\*\* This questionnaire includes thirty-three true or false statements that identify the presence of unexplained physical symptoms. Some statements are reverse coded. Higher total scores show more frequent or severe somatic complaints. 5. \*\*Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support:\*\* This twelve-question scale measures perceived emotional and practical support from three sources: family, friends, and a significant other. Each item is rated on a seven-point scale. Higher scores represent stronger perceived social support. In addition to these scales, sociodemographic data such as age, sex, marital status, education, occupation, and income were recorded. Exclusion criteria included the presence of severe psychiatric disorders, neurological disease, or cognitive impairment that could interfere with understanding or completing the questionnaires. All collected data were analyzed using appropriate statistical methods. Distribution normality was assessed, and comparisons between the two groups were performed using suitable parametric or non-parametric tests. Associations among the measured psychological and functional parameters were examined through correlation analyses. The objective of this study was to identify potential associations between Type D personality, somatization, and perceived social support in individuals with temporomandibular joint disorders. By evaluating these interrelated psychological and social variables, the study sought to emphasize the importance of a holistic and multidisciplinary approach in understanding and managing temporomandibular joint disorders.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
90
Yozgat Bozok University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Yozgat, Yozgat, Turkey (Türkiye)
Type D Personality Traits
The primary outcome of this study was the evaluation of Type D personality traits in individuals with temporomandibular joint disorders compared to healthy controls. Type D personality was assessed with a fourteen-item scale measuring two main dimensions: negative emotions and social inhibition. Each item is scored from zero to four. A score of ten or more in both dimensions indicates the presence of Type D personality traits. The Turkish version of the scale has been validated and shown to be reliable. Higher total scores indicate stronger negative emotional responses and greater social inhibition.
Time frame: At the time of study enrollment.
the Somatization Scale
Somatic symptom severity was measured using a thirty-three-item true or false questionnaire. Seventeen items are reverse-coded to control for response bias. One point is given for each correct standard response and for incorrect responses to reverse-coded items. The total score ranges from zero to thirty-three, with higher scores reflecting more pronounced somatization tendencies. The Turkish version of this instrument has demonstrated reliability and construct validity in previous psychometric evaluations.
Time frame: At the time of study enrollment.
the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
Perceived emotional and practical support was evaluated using a twelve-item questionnaire measuring three main sources of support: family, friends, and a significant other. Each statement is rated on a seven-point scale ranging from one (very strongly disagree) to seven (very strongly agree). Subscale scores range from four to twenty-eight, and total scores range from twelve to eighty-four. Higher scores indicate greater perceived social support. The Turkish version of this scale has been shown to have high reliability and validity
Time frame: At the time of study enrollment.
the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Symptoms of anxiety and depression were evaluated using a fourteen-item self-report scale consisting of two subscales, each containing seven items. Each question is scored from zero to three, resulting in subscale scores ranging from zero to twenty-one. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. This tool has been validated in Turkish and is widely used to identify possible mood and anxiety symptoms in clinical and research settings.
Time frame: At the time of study enrollment
the Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire
Jaw function and movement limitations were evaluated using a seventeen-item questionnaire assessing the degree of difficulty in performing daily activities involving mandibular movement. Each item is rated on a five-point scale from zero (no difficulty) to four (very severe difficulty). The total score ranges from zero to sixty-eight, with higher scores indicating greater functional impairment of the jaw. The Turkish adaptation of this scale has demonstrated strong reliability and validity.
Time frame: At the time of study enrollment.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.