Reference MRI scan is recommended 6 months after treatment onset in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), and follow-up scans at 12 months later to monitor subclinical activity. When monitoring treatment response in patients treated with disease modifying treatments (DMTs), the measurement of new or enlarging T2/FLAIR hyperintense lesions (NELs) is the preferred MRI method supplemented by contrast-enhancing lesions (CELs) for monitoring treatment response. However, some studies have suggested the deposition of gadolinium-based contrast agents in the basal ganglia and dentate nucleus of patients who underwent serial MRI acquisitions. Although significant clinical consequences of these deposits have not been demonstrated, further studies are required to better understand the potential long-term biological and clinical effects of gadolinium administration. To circumvent this potential risk, several recommendations suggested avoiding unnecessary use of gadolinium for follow-up scans. New sequences are also developed to replace gadolinium injection for the detection of active lesions. Moreover, MRI remains costly and time-consuming. In addition, systematic yearly MRI monitoring is not adapted to detect silent active lesions. This can delay identification of treatment failure and increase the risk of relapses and disability worsening, especially in the context of escalation therapy. Therefore, biological markers could allow more frequent analysis of disease activity and detect treatment failure earlier than classical clinical and MRI monitoring. Their use would greatly help clinicians to switch for high efficacy treatments (HET) and avoid potential relapses. Measurement of a structural axonal protein, neurofilament, in serum or plasma has shown promise as a marker of neuroaxonal injury and a measure of treatment response. In MS, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) neurofilament-light chain (NfL) is also increased and is positively associated with MRI lesion load and disability scores and is a marker of treatment response. WThe study authors hypothesize that monthly plasma neurofilament-light chain (pNfL) monitoring can sensitively highlight subclinical (radiological disease activity) RDA by performing early MRI scans to confirm EDA and lead to timely treatment escalation. The main objective of this study is to compare the time to EDA in both arms (monthly pNfL monitoring vs. standard care with regular MRI scans), in patients with EDA.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
84
Monthly pNfL monitoring from blood samples. In case of \>50% pNfL increase as compared to the mean of the 2 previous measures, an unscheduled visit with brain and spinal cord MRI will be scheduled
CHU de Nîmes
Nîmes, France
Time to evidence of disease activity between groups
As assessed by new relapse and/or occurrence of NELs and/or CELs on a follow-up MRI scan
Time frame: Month 12
Time to evidence of disease activity between groups
As assessed by new relapse and/or occurrence of NELs and/or CELs on a follow-up MRI scan
Time frame: Month 24
Proportion of CELs between groups
percent of active (contrast-enhancing) lesion
Time frame: Month 12
Proportion of CELs between groups
percent of active (contrast-enhancing) lesion
Time frame: Month 24
Rate of clinical relapses between groups
percentage patients experiencing relapse
Time frame: Month 12
Rate of clinical relapses between groups
percentage patients experiencing relapse
Time frame: Month 24
Time to switch to high efficacy treatments
Days
Time frame: Month 12
Time to switch to high efficacy treatments
Days
Time frame: Month 24
Proportion of patients switching to high efficacy treatments between groups
Percentage
Time frame: Month 12
Proportion of patients switching to high efficacy treatments between groups
Percentage
Time frame: Month 24
Change in pNfL levels in patients experiencing relapse with active MRI in experimental group
pg/mL; measured using Lumipulse® G NfL Blood
Time frame: Upon experiencing relapse (maximum Month 24)
Change in pNfL levels in patients experiencing acute clinical event in experimental group
pg/mL; measured using Lumipulse® G NfL Blood
Time frame: Upon experiencing an acute clinical event (maximum Month 24)
Change in pNfL levels in patients experiencing radiological disease activity without clinical symptoms in experimental group
pg/mL; measured using Lumipulse® G NfL Blood
Time frame: Upon experiencing radiological disease activity (maximum Month 24)
Change in pNfL levels in patients switching to high efficacy treatments
pg/mL; measured using Lumipulse® G NfL Blood
Time frame: Upon evidence of disease activity (maximum Month 24)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.