Using a Novel Balloon-shaped Large-Focal Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Overview

This clinical trial aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and linear ablation using a large-focal pulsed field ablation (PFA) catheter in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (perAF). The study will address two primary questions: 1. Is the procedure safe, as determined by the absence of serious device- or procedure-related adverse events within 7 days post-ablation? 2. Is the catheter effective in creating durable lesions, as assessed by invasive electrophysiological remapping? Study Design and Intervention Eligible patients with perAF underwent PVI and linear ablation under general anesthesia using the PFApple large-focal PFA catheter. The catheter delivers a biphasic, bipolar pulsed electric field (1000V, 0.04 ms pulse duration) to create spherical ablation lesions. Participant Follow-up Protocol Enrolled participants will complete the following assessments: 1. Index Procedure: PVI and linear ablation with the PFApple PFA catheter. 2. Durability Assessment: Repeat invasive electrophysiological remapping at 3 months post-ablation to evaluate lesion durability. 3. Clinical Follow-up: Scheduled visits at 7 days, 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-procedure. Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence is assessed via 12-lead electrocardiography at each visit and 24-hour or 7-day Holter monitoring at the 6- and 12-month time points.

Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia worldwide. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the established cornerstone therapy for symptomatic, drug-refractory AF. However, for persistent AF (PerAF), the efficacy of PVI alone is reduced compared to its effect in paroxysmal AF. Consequently, adjunctive ablation strategies beyond PVI are often employed in PerAF treatment. Radiofrequency ablation remains the predominant conventional thermal technique for PerAF. However, its extensive application risks collateral tissue damage and procedure-related complications. These risks present significant challenges to achieving complete, transmural lesions, which may compromise overall ablation efficacy. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an emerging non-thermal technology that induces rapid lesion formation via irreversible electroporation. This modality demonstrates high myocardial selectivity, effectively ablating cardiac tissue while sparing adjacent structures. Preclinical and clinical studies of PFA for PVI report durable lesions and an excellent safety profile, with no evidence of collateral damage. A PVI-plus-additional-ablation (PVI+) strategy is commonly used for PerAF to improve arrhythmia-free survival. However, data on the feasibility and safety of PFA for adjunctive PVI+ ablation remain limited. Whether PFA can enhance the safety and efficacy of PVI+ strategies in PerAF requires further investigation. This first-in-human study aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a novel balloon-shaped, large-focal PFA catheter for PVI+ strategies in patients with PerAF. Methods Study Design This was a first-in-human, prospective, single-arm, single-center trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of a novel balloon-shaped, large-focal PFA catheter (PFapple™, EnChannel Medical, Guangdong, China) in patients with PerAF. The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written informed consent. Study Population Eligible patients were 18-75 years old with documented symptomatic PerAF (AF duration 7-365 days) who were refractory or intolerant to at least one Class I or III antiarrhythmic drug. Procedural Workflow All procedures were performed under general anesthesia. Following femoral venous access, intravenous heparin was administered to maintain an activated clotting time ≥300 seconds. A decapolar catheter was positioned in the coronary sinus and a ventricular electrode in the right ventricle. Transseptal puncture was performed under fluoroscopic guidance. An electroanatomic map of the left atrium and pulmonary veins was created using a PENTARAY® catheter and the CARTO 3 system (Biosense Webster). The PFA sheath was inserted and continuously flushed. The PFApple catheter was advanced into the left atrium and navigated to target sites. PVI was performed in all patients using a wide antral circumferential, point-to-point technique. Typically, 20-30 ablation points were deployed along the PV antrum, maintaining an inter-point distance \<10 mm to ensure lesion continuity and transmurality. Additional ablation strategies were performed at the operator's discretion. Linear ablation targets included the left atrial posterior wall (LAPW), mitral isthmus (MI), or cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI), with bidirectional block as the endpoint. For MI ablation, if persistent epicardial connections were identified, adjunctive ablation within the coronary sinus was performed. After a 20-minute waiting period, isolation and block were reassessed. Additional applications were delivered as needed. If AF persisted, electrical cardioversion was performed to restore sinus rhythm. Post-procedure voltage maps were generated to characterize the ablation sets. Follow-up Post-ablation antiarrhythmic drug use was determined by the operator and typically discontinued after three months. Oral anticoagulation was maintained per guidelines. Structured follow-up occurred at 7 days and 3 months post-ablation, with lesion durability assessed via invasive remapping at 3 months. Additional visits were scheduled at 6 and 12 months. Arrhythmia recurrence was assessed using 12-lead ECGs at each visit and 24-hour or 7-day Holter monitoring at 3, 6, and 12 months. Endpoints The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of primary adverse events (PAEs) within 7 days post-ablation. Later-occurring events (device/procedure-related death, atrio-esophageal fistula, PV stenosis) were also classified as PAEs. Persistent diaphragmatic paralysis or phrenic nerve palsy at 3 months were considered PAEs. The primary efficacy endpoint was acute procedural success, defined as the proportion of patients achieving: 1) complete electrical isolation of all PVs, and 2) for those undergoing linear ablation, confirmed bidirectional block at all targeted sites (LAPW, MI, CTI). Secondary efficacy endpoints included: 1. Acute PV isolation success rate. 2. Acute success rate of bidirectional block for each linear ablation site. 3. Durable success rate of bidirectional block for each linear ablation site at 3-month remapping. 4. One-year freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence.