The biological effective dose of short-course radiotherapy is relatively lower compared to long-course radiotherapy, which may lead to an increased local recurrence rate in patients with mid to low rectal cancer who are at high risk of locally advanced disease due to insufficient radiation dose. Combining short-course radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) and immunotherapy-chemo regimens could potentially further enhance tumor regression and improve local control, providing a promising treatment option for high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer patients. Therefore, this clinical trial aims to explore the safety and effectiveness of a short-course SIB radiotherapy regimen combined with immunotherapy and chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer, based on short-course radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy and immunotherapy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
37
The pelvic lymphatic drainage regions receive 25 Gy in 5 fractions (5 Gy per fraction). A ssequential boost to a total dose of 30 Gy in 6 fractions is delivered to the primary tumour and any radiologically suspicious lymph nodes.
* Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² intravenously on day 1. * Capecitabine 1,000 mg/m² orally twice daily on days 1-14.
\- Tislelizumab 200 mg intravenously on day 1.
Department of colorectal surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
The Complete Response (CR) rate
The Complete Response (CR) rate refers to the sum of the pathological Complete Response (pCR) rate, defined as the absence of residual cancer cells in the surgical resection specimen observed microscopically, and the probability of patients achieving clinical Complete Response (cCR) who then undergo a watchful waiting (W\&W) approach. The primary endpoint of my study is the CR rate.
Time frame: 3 months
Rate of ≥Grade 3 toxicities
This endpoint measures the incidence of adverse events classified as Grade 3 or higher according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). A Grade 3 toxicity indicates a severe reaction that significantly affects the patient's daily activities and typically requires medical intervention. Monitoring the rate of these serious toxicities will help evaluate the safety profile of the treatment regimen, including neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy combined with simultaneous integrated boost, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy, in patients with high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer. Assessing these toxicities is critical for understanding the balance between therapeutic efficacy and tolerability in this patient population.
Time frame: 3 months
3-Year Disease-Free Survival Rate (3yDFS%)
The 3-Year Disease-Free Survival Rate (3yDFS%) refers to the percentage of patients who do not experience any disease progression within three years after completing the treatment.
Time frame: 3 years
3-Year Locoregional Recurrence-Free Survival Rate (3yLRFS%)
The 3-Year Locoregional Recurrence-Free Survival Rate (3yLRFS%) is defined as the percentage of patients who remain free from locoregional recurrence of cancer for three years after completing the treatment.
Time frame: 3 years
3-Year Overall Survival Rate (3yOS%)
This endpoint refers to the percentage of patients who are still alive three years after receiving the treatment, regardless of disease status.
Time frame: 3 years
Surgical Complications
This endpoint assesses the occurrence of adverse events related to the surgical procedure performed on patients with high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer. Surgical complications may include infections, bleeding, anastomotic leaks, and any other significant morbidity that may influence the patient's postoperative recovery.
Time frame: 6 months
Quality of Life (QoL)
This endpoint evaluates the overall well-being of patients following treatment, focusing on their physical, emotional, and social health. Quality of Life assessments will be performed using validated questionnaires, such as the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). This scale comprises multiple dimensions, including physical functioning, emotional functioning, and social functioning, with scores ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. The assessments will provide insights into patients' functional status and any changes in health-related quality of life resulting from the treatment regimen. Understanding QoL outcomes is essential for assessing the patient-centered effectiveness of the therapeutic approach and ensuring that treatment strategies not only target disease control but also support the overall well-being of patients.
Time frame: 3 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.