AIM: -The aim of the study is to compare the outcome of Direct Pulp Capping and Partial Pulpotomy in mature permanent teeth with Reversible Pulpitis OBJECTIVES: - Primary Objective: to compare the difference in clinical and radiographic outcome of direct pulp capping and partial pulpotomy in mature permanent teeth with Reversible Pulpitis. Secondary objective: To evaluate and compare postoperative pain after Direct Pulp Capping and Partial Pulpotomy in teeth with Reversible Pulpitis STUDY GROUPS: - Subjects of age group 15 to 40 years will be included and divided into two groups 1. Direct Pulp Capping in Permanent mature molars with Reversible Pulpitis 2. Partial Pulpotomy in Permanent mature molars with Reversible Pulpitis
TITLE: Outcome of Direct Pulp Capping and Partial Pulpotomy in Reversible Pulpitis It aims to answer does outcome of direct pulp capping and partial pulpotomy differ in mature permanent teeth with extremely deep caries with reversible pulpitis. P (Population) - Mature permanent mandibular molars with extremely deep caries and clinical signs of reversible pulpitis. I (Intervention) -Direct Pulp Capping in teeth with Reversible Pulpitis. C (Comparison) -Partial Pulpotomy in teeth with Reversible Pulpitis. O (Outcome) -Assessment of clinical \& radiographic success at 6 and 12 months follow up -Assessment of pain experience at baseline, post-operatively every 24 hours for 1 week In extremely deep lesions, the dental pulp is often inflamed or at risk of microbial contamination, therefore requiring timely and precise intervention in order to preserve pulp vitality. In such cases, the removal of the superficial 2-3 mm of inflamed pulp tissue can help maintain the health of the remaining pulpal tissue. Duncan and other researchers have emphasized the importance of assessing both caries depth and pulpal status for deciding the effective treatment plan. Although numerous studies have investigated the outcomes of Direct Pulp Capping (DPC) and Partial Pulpotomy separately \& have included cases based on caries depth \& pulpal status, such as reversible pulpitis. However, there remains a notable lack of comparative clinical studies directly evaluating partial pulpotomy and direct pulp capping under standardized conditions involving extremely deep carious lesions with pulpal status as reversible pulpitis. Hence, this clinical trial aims to assess and compare the clinical and radiographic outcome of Direct Pulp Capping and Partial Pulpotomy in extremely deep caries with reversible pulpitis.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
138
Procedure/Surgery: Outcome of Partial Pulpotomy in teeth with clinical signs indicative of Reversible Pulpitis with extremely deep caries. After caries removal and pulp exposure , 2-3 mm of pulp tissue will be amputated and the pulpal wound irrigated with 3% NaOCl. Bleeding will be controlled by placing a cotton pellet soaked in 3% NaOCl over the pulpal wound for 2-3 minutes, repeated if required. This will be followed by capping with a 2-3 mm layer of MTA in both the groups. A layer of RMGIC will then be placed over the MTA, and the tooth will be permanently restored with composite resin.
Outcome of direct pulp capping in teeth with clinical signs indicative of reversible pulpitis. After caries removal and pulp exposure pulpal wound will be irrigated with 3% NaOCl, and bleeding will be controlled by placing a cotton pellet soaked with 3% NaOCl over the pulpal wound for 2 to 3 minutes and will be repeated if required. Followed by capping with MTA, a layer of RMGIC will be placed over the MTA. Then the tooth will be permanently restored with composite resin.
PGIDS Rohtak
Rohtak, Haryana, India
Success rate at 1 year
Criteria for success:- Clinical: 1. Absence of signs and symptoms of spontaneous pain or pain on stimulus and discomfort except for the first few days after treatment. 2. No tenderness to palpation or percussion and the tooth is functional. 3. Normal mobility and probing pocket depth. 4. Absence of associated soft tissue swelling, sinus or fistula. Radiographic: - 1\. Absence of any periapical or interradicular radiolucency. 2. Complete radiographic healing (PAI score 1 or 2 acc. to Ostravik et al). 3. Absence of internal and external root resorption Tooth will be considered successful when all the above parameters are met.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Postoperative Pain
Post Operative Pain- To assess incidence and intensity of pain postoperatively at every 24 hours till 7 days using Visual analogue Scale of 0 to 100 millimeter line. Score 0 means no pain and Score100 means maximum pain. To assess incidence and intensity of pain postoperatively at every 24 hours till 7 days using Visual analogue Scale of 0 to 100 millimeter line. Score 0 means no pain and Score 100 means maximum pain.
Time frame: Baseline and at 24 hours, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6 and Day 7 after the treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.