Spasticity is an umbrella term for impairments of muscle tone and control in people with damage to the brain and spinal cord. It is highly prevalent and results in pain, stiffness, and contribute to difficulties in activities of daily living. Current treatment options are limited, and many people experience only partial reduction in spasticity and frequent repeated treatments are needed. Cryoneurolysis is a medical technique which involves the controlled freezing of the nerves. It has been approved in the UK for the treatment of pain in the context of spasticity through the targeting of nerves which control problematic muscles. Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust has been offering this treatment routinely since January 2024. This pilot study aims to improve the understanding of the potential effectiveness of this treatment and its potential side effects when compared with a more commonly used treatment (Botulinum Toxin). Participants will be randomly allocated to receive usual care with Botulinum Toxin (control group) or usual care with Cryoneurolysis (intervention group). The investigators will assess pain, goal attainment, side effects, spasticity, disability and independence in daily activities, and movement of the arm and leg. Assessments will be at baseline and then 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-weeks following treatment. Participants who are randomised to the control group will have the opportunity to receive cryoneurolysis treatment after the 12 week follow up assessment. The results of this study will help to guide future studies to examine the effectiveness of this treatment.
Spasticity is an umbrella term for impairments of muscle activity and control in the context of damage or dysfunction in the central nervous system, occurring in up to 87% of spinal cord injury patients, 42% of stroke patients, and 80% of patients with multiple sclerosis. Spasticity results in pain, stiffness, and restrictions to activity including difficulties in personal care and mobility and a significant impact on quality of life. Treatments including oral medications, botulinum toxin injections, and physical therapies can provide some degree of relief, but effectiveness varies widely. Many patients experience only partial reduction in spasticity, contributing to ongoing functional limitations. Botulinum toxin injections provide temporary relief necessitating frequent treatments (every 3-4 months). This is burdensome for patients and healthcare providers, with associated time and treatment costs. Pharmacological treatments can lead to systemic side effects including drowsiness, dizziness, and cognitive impairments. Surgical interventions are resource-intensive and require specialised medical facilities. Their associated costs, in terms of financial resources and healthcare infrastructure, significantly limit access for certain patients. Cryoneurolysis, a novel medical technique, involves the controlled freezing of nerve tissue to temporarily disrupt its function. While primarily used for pain, there is a growing interest in its application for managing spasticity and it is currently approved for the treatment of pain in the context of spasticity at Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust. Observational studies suggest immediate relaxation of the affected muscles, resulting in improved joint range of motion, enhanced functional mobility, and reduced pain. The investigators' own open-label proof-of-principle clinical data suggest the potential for substantial improvements in the impact of spasticity on quality of life. This pilot randomised controlled study aims to improve the understanding of the potential clinical effectiveness and side effect profile of cryoneurolysis as a treatment for pain in the context of spasticity in people with a range of neurological conditions (e.g. acquired brain injury (ABI), spinal cord injury, stroke, multiple sclerosis).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
50
Nerves that require treatment, and the number of treatments required for each nerve will be identified by routine clinical judgement. Nerve targets are identified using an ultrasound machine. The handheld Iovera cryoneurolysis device will be used for treatment. Participants will receive up to 4 treatments of cryoneurolysis for each nerve or nerve branch that requires treatment. It is anticipated that participants will have between 1 and 5 nerves or nerve branches per limb treated. Each Cryoneurolysis treatment takes 110 seconds. Total treatment time will be determined by number of nerves targeted and number of cryoneurolysis treatments per nerve. The shortest duration, with setup, is likely to be 60 minutes and the longest 120 minutes.
Muscles that require treatment with Botulinum Toxin will be identified by routine clinical assessment. Muscle targets will be identified using an ultrasound machine. It is anticipated that participants will have between 2 and 8 muscles identified for target. The participant will receive up to 200 units of Xeomin (Botulinum Toxin) per muscle that requires treatment. Treatment session of Botulinum Toxin will take 60 to 90 minutes.
Oxford Centre for Enablement (OUH NHS-FT)
Oxford, United Kingdom
RECRUITINGGoal Attainment Scale
An individualised outcome measure involving goal selection and goal scaling that is standardised in order to calculate the extent to which a patient's goals are met. GAS comprises of goals divided into a 5-point scale of level of expected outcome: from -2 (much less than expected) to +2 (much more than expected).
Time frame: 6-weeks post-treatment
Self-reported Pain
Self-report, as measured by a numerical rating scale (range 0 - 10, higher scores indicating higher pain levels).
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks post-treatment
Douleur Neuropathique en 4 (DN4)
Questionnaire used to determine whether pain is neuropathic in origin (range 0 - 10; a score of 4 or more suggests the presence of neuropathic pain).
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks post-treatment
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI)
Questionnaire used to quantify neuropathic pain (range 0 - 100, higher scores reflect worse neuropathic pain).
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks post-treatment
Side Effects
As measured by self-report side effects questionnaire
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks post-treatment
Goal Attainment Scale
An individualised outcome measure involving goal selection and goal scaling that is standardised in order to calculate the extent to which a patient's goals are met. GAS comprises of goals divided into a 5-point scale of level of expected outcome: from -2 (much less than expected) to +2 (much more than expected).
Time frame: 12-weeks post treatment
Modified Ashworth Scale
Assessment which requires the researcher to passively move the person's affected limb(s) and assess their resistance to movement (score range 0 - 4, higher score indicating increased in tone).
Time frame: 6- and 12-weeks post treatment
Modified Tardieu Scale
Assessment which requires the researcher to passively move the person's affected limb(s) and assess their resistance to movement (score range 0 - 4, higher score indicating increased resistance).
Time frame: 6- and 12-weeks post treatment
Spasticity
Directly assessed by measuring the muscle activity to a passive stretch
Time frame: 6- and 12-weeks post treatment
Range of Motion
Assessed using a goniometer
Time frame: 6- and 12-weeks post treatment
Patient Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure (PRISM)
Questionnaire assessing spasticity related quality of life (41 items that describe impacts of spasticity, each of which is rated on a scale of 0-4 from "never true for me" to "very often true for me").
Time frame: 6- and 12-weeks post treatment
EQ5D
Questionnaire assessing quality of life across 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels which are scored 1 - 5, with higher scores indicating worse outcome.
Time frame: 6- and 12-weeks post treatment
Spasticity Related Quality of Life instrument (SQoL-6D)
Questionnaire assessing spasticity related quality of life (range 0 - 24, higher score indicating worse condition)
Time frame: 6- and 12-weeks post treatment
Barthel Index
Scale measuring a person's ability to complete activities of daily living (range 0 - 100, higher scores indicating more independence)
Time frame: 6- and 12-weeks post treatment
Gait assessment - Walking Speed
Kinematic assessment of lower extremity function, using EMG and motion capture cameras. Walking speed is measured in meters per second (m/s), with slower speed indicating worse outcome.
Time frame: 6- and 12-weeks post treatment
Gait assessment - Gait profile score
Kinematic assessment of lower extremity function using EMG and motion capture cameras. The gait profile score is measured in degrees, with higher scores indicating more abnormality, and no maximum score.
Time frame: 6- and 12-weeks post treatment
Leg Activity Measure (LEG-A)
Questionnaire assessing lower extremity function (3 sections: Section A range: 0-36; Section B range 0-60; Section C range 0 - 36. Higher score indicates more difficulty/severity.)
Time frame: 6- and 12-weeks post treatment
Shriners Hospital Upper Extremity Evaluation (SHUEE)
Kinematic assessment of upper extremity function using motion capture cameras.
Time frame: 6- and 12-weeks post treatment
Arm Activity Measure (ARM-A)
Questionnaire assessing upper extremity function (2 sections: Section A range: 0-32; Section B range 0-52. Higher score indicates more difficulty.)
Time frame: 6- and 12-weeks post treatment
Functional Assessment Test for Upper Limb (FAST-UL)
Assessment of upper extremity function (selected movements assessed and scored between 0 - 3, with higher scores indicating ability to complete movement more fully).
Time frame: 6- and 12-weeks post treatment
Pressure Pain Thresholds (PPT)
Sensory testing using a manual algometer to assess pain thresholds.
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks post-treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.