Neurodynamic mobilization techniques are widely applied in rehabilitation and physiotherapy to enhance the mobility and function of peripheral nerves. Two main approaches are distinguished. Nerve tensioning and nerve flossing. They both involve proximal and distal joint movements to induce greater neural sliding while avoiding excessive tensile stress. However, contradictory findings on neurodynamic techniques highlighted the current lack of consensus regarding these techniques. Moreover, neurodynamic techniques are of interest for patients, it appeared it could also be applied in healthy individuals and more particularly in athletes. Accordingly, the primary objective of the present study was to determine the immediate effect of two neurodynamic mobilization techniques (flossing vs. tensioning) on the sciatic nerve and hamstring tissues using the shear wave elastography (SWE, a form of ultrasonography).
Neurodynamic mobilization techniques are frequently applied in rehabilitation settings to enhance the mobility and function of peripheral nerves, particularly in the management of neuropathic pain such as carpal tunnel syndrome, radiculopathies, or sciatica. Two main approaches are distinguished. Nerve tensioning involves maintaining the nerve stretched at the end of the joint range of motion with relatively limited excursion. It is similar to a static stretching intervention but with distal (ankle) and proximal (cervical) tensions. Nerve flossing (also termed gliding or sliders), consists of alternating proximal and distal joint movements to induce greater neural sliding while avoiding excessive tensile stress. However, contradictory findings on neurodynamic techniques highlighted the current lack of consensus regarding the acute effects of the different possible neurodynamic techniques on sciatic nerves, particularly in healthy tissues. Moreover, neurodynamic techniques are of interest for patients, it appeared it could also be applied in healthy individuals and more particularly in athletes. Performed in patients, healthy or athletes, no study has compared both tensioning or flossing techniques. Moreover, because these techniques involved nerve mobilisation, the intensity should have a main effect of its efficiency. Accordingly, the primary objective of the present study was to determine the immediate effect of two neurodynamic mobilization techniques (flossing vs. tensioning) on the sciatic nerve and hamstring tissues using the shear wave elastography (SWE). This method has been shown reliable to provide non-invasive real-time assessments of soft tissues elastic properties. The secondary aim was to determine the effects of stretching intensity (at the point of pain threshold or below).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
21
Static stretching was applied at pain threshold on hamstring muscles and repeated 5 times during 60s at the point of pain. Static stretching mainly focused muscle-tendon tissues.
Static stretching was applied 10% below pain threshold on hamstring muscles and repeated 5 times during 60s at the point of pain. Static stretching mainly focused muscle-tendon tissues.
Neurodynamic tensioning was applied at pain threshold on hamstring muscles and repeated 5 times during 60s at the point of pain. During the neurodynamic conditions, head and ankle movement permitted to mobilize nerve tissues. Tensioning is maintaining the position.
Neurodynamic tensioning was applied 10% below pain threshold on hamstring muscles and repeated 5 times during 60s at the point of pain. During the neurodynamic conditions, head and ankle movement permitted to mobilize nerve tissues. Tensioning is maintaining the position.
Neurodynamic flossing was applied at pain threshold on hamstring muscles and repeated 5 times during 60s at the point of pain. During the neurodynamic conditions, head and ankle movement permitted to mobilize nerve tissues. Flossing is the alternation of these movements every 2 seconds.
Neurodynamic flossing was applied 10% below pain threshold on hamstring muscles and repeated 5 times during 60s at the point of pain. During the neurodynamic conditions, head and ankle movement permitted to mobilize nerve tissues. Flossing is the alternation of these movements every 2 seconds.
Universite Bourgogne Europe - faculty of sports sciences
Dijon, France
Nerve shear wave velocity using elastography
Shear wave velocity of the sciatic nerve will be evaluated by using an ultrasound (echography) device with a specific mode called "shear wave elastography". Briefly, the ultrasound probe will deliver an ultrasound wave. The propagation speed (called '"shear wave velocity") will be measured by the same probe. The greater the velocity is, the harder the tissue is.
Time frame: Before the intervention and at the end (immediately after) the intervention
Muscle shear wave velocity using elastography
Shear wave velocity of the biceps femoris muscle will be evaluated by using an ultrasound (echography) device with a specific mode called "shear wave elastography". Briefly, the ultrasound probe will deliver an ultrasound wave. The propagation speed (called '"shear wave velocity") will be measured by the same probe. The greater the velocity is, the harder the tissue is.
Time frame: Before the intervention and at the end (immediately after) the intervention
Hamstring force
Maximal torque during a maximal voluntary hamstring contraction
Time frame: Before the intervention and at the end (immediately after) the intervention
Biceps femoris activity
Electromyographic activity of biceps femoris muscle
Time frame: Before the intervention and at the end (immediately after) the intervention
Semitendinosus activity
Electromyographic activity of semitendinosus
Time frame: Before the intervention and at the end (immediately after) the intervention
passive knee extension
The final passive range of motion of the hamstring muscles
Time frame: Before the intervention and at the end (immediately after) the intervention
Global flexibility
the stand and reach test to evaluate flexibility (in centimeters)
Time frame: Before the intervention and at the end (immediately after) the intervention
Slump test
Seated flexibility using the slump test (in degrees)
Time frame: Before the intervention and at the end (immediately after) the intervention
discomfort
rating of perceived discomfort during the intervention (from 1 to 10, no discomfort to maximal discomfort, respectively)
Time frame: At the end (immediately after) the intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.