1. To evaluate the efficacy of a standardized multimodal Opioid Sparing (OS) protocol versus conventional opioid-based analgesia in reducing acute postoperative 2. To quantify opioid consumption reduction achievable through OS strategies 3. To assess the impact of OS on hemodynamic parameters during critical surgical phases 4. To compare recovery metrics (PONV, bowel function, ambulation) 5. To evaluate the safety profile of OS anesthesia
The ongoing opioid crisis represents a significant public health challenge, with surgical prescriptions being a major contributor to chronic opioid use and misuse. Recent epidemiological data indicate that 4-6% of opioid- naïve patients develop persistent opioid use postoperatively, with laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients being particularly vulnerable due to moderate postoperative pain . Despite being a minimally invasive procedure, laparoscopic cholecystectomy consistently ranks among the most common general surgical procedures worldwide, with over 1 million performed annually in the United States alone. This frequency amplifies the population-level impact of postoperative prescribing patterns . Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of individual components-dexmedetomidine for hemodynamic stabilization, lidocaine infusions for visceral analgesia, and regional techniques like erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks-but their synergistic effects remain underexplored . A recent scoping review highlighted that while opioid-sparing (OS) effects are frequently reported, evidence for clinically meaningful outcomes (e.g., reduced ventilation time, accelerated functional recovery) remains limited . The pathophysiology of post-cholecystectomy pain involves both somatic (abdominal wall) and visceral (diaphragmatic irritation, biliary spasm) components, necessitating a multimodal approach. Opioids inadequately address inflammatory mediators while introducing risks of respiratory depression, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), ileus, and hemodynamic instability. Emerging evidence suggests that α-2 agonists (e.g., dexmedetomidine) and NMDA ant
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
110
Maintenance Dexmedetomidine 0.2-0.5 µg/kg/h + Lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg/h + Magnesium 10 mg/kg/h; Sevoflurane as required; Atracurium 0.1 mg/kg IV PRN
Pain intensity at rest postoperatively (Visual Analog Scale, VAS, 0-10)
Pain intensity at rest will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), which ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Higher scores indicate worse pain.
Time frame: 48 hours post operative
Cumulative opioid use (MME)
Cumulative opioid consumption will be measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) administered to each patient.
Time frame: 48 hours post operative
Time to extubating
Time to extubating; time to Aldrete ≥9
Time frame: 24 hours post operative
Time to first rescue analgesia
time to first demand for rescue analgesia
Time frame: 24 hours post operative
Bowel recovery (first flatus)
Time in hours from completion of surgery until the patient passes first flatus, representing bowel recovery.
Time frame: 48 hours post operative
Ambulation tolerance
Assessment of the patient's ability to ambulate, measured as distance walked in feet or meters within specified postoperative periods.
Time frame: 48 hours post operative
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.