The goal of this clinical study is to learn how well a urine test called Xpert® Bladder Cancer Detect (Xpert BC-D) can help doctors assess the risk of bladder cancer in people with non-visible blood in their urine (microscopic hematuria). The main questions it aims to answer are: * Can the Xpert BC-D test accurately identify people at higher risk for bladder cancer? * Can combining the test results with other clinical information improve risk assessment compared to standard evaluation methods? Participants will: * Have leftover urine from the routine initial evaluation tested with the Xpert® Bladder Cancer Detect assay * Complete questionnaires about urinary symptoms using the modified IPSS and ICIQ-FLUT-S forms * Attend a first visit for medical evaluation and cystoscopy * Attend a follow-up visit 3 to 6 months later for additional testing and questionnaires This study includes adults over 40 years of age who have had microscopic hematuria detected within the past six months. People with a history of bladder cancer, urinary tract surgery, or certain other medical conditions, as well as individuals who are currently pregnant, cannot participate. The study will be conducted at 20-24 sites in Germany and Austria and will last approximately 27 months, with each participant involved for about 6 months. The results of this study may help doctors better decide which patients need further invasive testing, potentially reducing unnecessary procedures.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
1,475
Urology and Pediatric Urology University Hospital Ulm
Ulm, Germany
Validating results of a recent metanalysis (UroDetect II) achieving an overall sensitivity of the Xpert BC-D for UCas of >0.70 and a specificity of >0.65
Time frame: From enrollment until completion of follow-up at 6 months
Effective detection of high impact tumors (HITs, defined as Ta G3/HG, CIS, and ≥T1 urothelial cancer)
Time frame: From enrollment until completion of follow-up at 6 months
Validating results from a recent meta-analysis demonstrating improved risk stratification by combining the Xpert BC-D results with clinical parameters
Time frame: From enrollment until completion of follow-up at 6 months
Simulating application of current major guideline recommendations, a significantly better discrimination between patients at low/high risk for subsequent UCa diagnosis for: The Xpert BC-D results and combinations from Xpert BC-D results and clinical
Time frame: From enrollment until completion of follow-up at 6 months
Cost-benefit considerations (based on structured information e.g. from GOÄ and EBM)
Time frame: From enrollment until completion of follow-up at 6 months
Investigating the rate of negative TUR-Bs triggered by standard-of-care (SOC) vs. positive findings by Xpert BC-D results and respective combination with clinical results. (study not powered for confirmation of a significant difference)
Time frame: From enrollment until completion of follow-up at 6 months
Prospective assessment of symptoms of nvH patients (assessment using modified versions of ICIQ-FLUTS and IPSS)
Time frame: From enrollment until completion of follow-up at 6 months
Investigating the frequency of conditions requiring medical and/or surgical intervention resulting from nvH assessment
Time frame: From enrollment until completion of follow-up at 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.