Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) stands as a formidable global health challenge. It ranks as the sixth most common malignant solid tumor worldwide and the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality. The disease is characterized by its insidious onset, rapid progression, and high recurrence rates, contributing to a dismal 5-year survival rate of approximately 18%. A critical factor in this poor prognosis is that nearly 57% of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, where curative surgical resection is no longer feasible. For these patients with unresectable advanced HCC (uHCC), effective systemic therapies are paramount to extend survival and improve quality of life. The advent of immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis, has revolutionized the treatment landscape for numerous advanced cancers, including uHCC. These agents work by blocking the inhibitory signals that tumor cells exploit to evade immune surveillance, thereby reactivating cytotoxic T cells to attack the cancer. However, the clinical benefit of ICI-based therapies is not universal. A substantial proportion of patients-estimated between 15% to 40%-derive limited or no benefit. Primary resistance is defined as a lack of initial response, while acquired resistance refers to disease progression after an initial period of clinical benefit. There is no established, evidence-based standard of therapy for uHCC patients who progress following first-line ICI combination therapy, highlighting an urgent need for novel therapeutic approaches. The mechanisms underlying acquired resistance to ICIs are multifaceted and intricately linked to dynamic remodeling of the tumor immune microenvironment (TME). Several key pathways contribute: 1. Loss of Tumor Immunogenicity: Immune editing during treatment can select for tumor cell clones with low neoantigen expression, making them less visible to the immune system. 2. Immune Suppressive Cell Infiltration: The TME in resistant tumors often exhibits an accumulation of immunosuppressive cell populations, including regulatory T cells (Tregs), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). These cells create a profoundly inhibitory milieu that dampens anti-tumor T cell function. 3. T Cell Exhaustion: Persistent antigen exposure leads to a state of CD8⁺ T cell exhaustion, rendering them dysfunctional. These interconnected mechanisms collectively foster an immunosuppressive TME that allows tumors to evade ongoing immune attack, underscoring the need for combination strategies that can reshape the TME and re-sensitize tumors to immunotherapy. The JAK-STAT pathway serves as a critical signaling hub for numerous cytokines and growth factors, playing a pivotal dual role in immunity and inflammation. In the context of HCC and ICI resistance, its activation is particularly relevant: 1. Pathway Activation in HCC: The JAK/STAT pathway is ubiquitously activated in both primary and recurrent HCC tumors and contributes to the proliferation and survival of tumor-initiating cells. 2. Driver of an Immunosuppressive TME: Hyperactivation of this pathway, often via cytokines like IL-6, promotes the recruitment and activation of immunosuppressive MDSCs and M2-polarized TAMs. It also contributes to T cell exhaustion. 3. Preclinical and Clinical Proof-of-Concept: In preclinical models, JAK/STAT inhibition has been shown to reduce MDSC infiltration and restore T cell function. Most compellingly, recent clinical studies in other cancer types published in high-impact journals like Science (2024) have demonstrated that adding a JAK inhibitor to PD-1 blockade can re-sensitize tumors and yield significant clinical responses in patients who had developed resistance to immunotherapy alone Purpose: This single-arm, exploratory clinical study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ivarmacitinib (a selective JAK1 inhibitor) combined with Camrelizumab (anti-PD-1) and Apatinib (anti-VEGFR2) in patients with advanced unresectable HCC who have progressed after first-line ICI-based combination therapy. Methods: This study plans to enroll 65 patients with advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (unresectable BCLC stage B or stage C) who have been clinically or pathologically diagnosed, have previously received at least 4 cycles of guideline-recommended first-line targeted therapy combined with PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy, achieved a partial response, but subsequently experienced disease progression confirmed by RECIST 1.1 criteria after at least 4 cycles (indicating acquired resistance). All enrolled patients will receive triple therapy consisting of Ivarmacitinib + Apatinib + Camrelizumab. Treatment will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or for up to 2 years.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
65
All enrolled patients will receive triple therapy consisting of Ivarmacitinib (4mg, orally, qd, starting immediately upon enrollment completion) + Apatinib (250mg, orally, qd, starting on day 8 after the initiation of Ivarmacitinib) + Camrelizumab (200mg, intravenous infusion, q3w, starting on day 8 after the initiation of Ivarmacitinib). Treatment will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or for up to 2 years.
The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, China
Objective Response Rate(ORR)
Tumor imaging assessments (RECIST 1.1) will be performed every 6 weeks within the first year after treatment initiation and every 9 weeks thereafter.
Time frame: 2 years
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
every 6 weeks within the first year after treatment initiation and every 9 weeks thereafter.
Time frame: 2 years
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
every 6 weeks within the first year after treatment initiation and every 9 weeks thereafter.
Time frame: 2 years
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall Survival (OS) will be assessed from the date of first study treatment until the date of death from any cause.
Time frame: 2 years
Adverse Events
Count of adverse events by grade was assessed using the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 5.0. Grade 1: Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age appropriate instrumental ADL. Grade 3: Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL. Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5: Death related to adverse event. Serious is defined as any grade 3 or higher adverse event. Toxicity is defined as any study drug-related Grade 3 or higher adverse event.
Time frame: 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.