Immediate Effects of Manual and Verbal Cueing During Movement Control Training in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain

N/ANot Yet RecruitingNCT07324538

National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University40 enrolled

Overview

Chronic non-specific low back pain is commonly associated with impaired movement control. Movement control training is often used in rehabilitation, and different cueing methods may influence how patients perform and learn movements. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the immediate effects of manual cueing and verbal cueing during movement control training in individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either manual cueing or verbal cueing during a standardized movement training session. The study will examine immediate changes in movement control performance, perceived difficulty, and related clinical outcomes following the intervention. The results of this study may help clinicians better understand how different cueing strategies influence movement performance in people with chronic non-specific low back pain.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Chronic Low Back Pain (Non-specific, Uncomplicated)

Interventions

Movement Control Training with Manual Cueing involves hands-on guidance provided by the therapist to enhance movement quality during standardized movement control training. Verbal instructions are used only to explain the movement sequence, while manuel guidance is primarily applied to facilitate movement quality. Manual cueing is delivered according to the individual's needs and may include the following strategies: 1. Gentle and evenly distributed manual pressure is applied to provide postural support and enhance awareness of appropriate points of support during movement. 2. Manuel guidance is used to assist joint alignment when suboptimal alignment is observed during task performance, with attention to maintaining balanced muscle tone. 3. Joint approximation techniques are applied as needed to provide compressive and stabilizing input to the joints, commonly used in neuromuscular facilitation approaches, to enhance joint stability and sensory feedback during movement.

Movement Control Training With Verbal CueingBEHAVIORAL

Movement control training with verbal cueing involves the use of spoken instructions and verbal feedback provided by the therapist to facilitate movement quality during standardized movement control training. Physical contact is not used during the intervention. Verbal instructions are focused on key aspects of movement performance, including alignment and weight distribution, to support correct execution of the movement tasks. Examples of verbal cues include instructions such as maintaining the knee in a neutral position or directing attention to the distribution of load through the shoulder girdle during task performance.

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Adults aged 18 years or older * Clinically diagnosed chronic non-specific low back pain with symptoms lasting longer than 12 weeks * Able to understand and comply with the assessment and intervention procedures Exclusion Criteria: * History of surgery involving the lower back or lower extremities * Presence of neurological symptoms, such as paresthesia or numbness * Signs or symptoms of nerve root compression * History of surgery within the past 3 months * History of cancer * Presence of major medical or psychiatric disorders * Presence of systemic inflammatory conditions * Pregnancy * Structural scoliosis * Inability to walk or stand independently, or any condition deemed unsuitable for participation by the investigator * Participation in any movement control exercise training within the past year

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Movement Control Performance

Movement control performance assessed using the Nine-Item Movement Control Test Battery, which evaluates movement quality during standardized functional movement tasks. Each item is scored according to predefined error-based criteria, and item scores are summed to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 93, with higher scores indicating poorer movement control performance.

Time frame: Immediately before and immediately after each intervention period

Pain Intensity

Pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.

Time frame: Immediately before and immediately after each intervention period

Secondary Outcomes

Perceived Difficulty Index

Perceived difficulty during movement performance assessed using the Perceived Difficulty Index (PDI). Participants rate the level of difficulty experienced during the movement tasks on a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no perceived difficulty and 10 indicates extreme difficulty, with higher scores indicating greater perceived difficulty.

Time frame: Immediately after each intervention period

Perceived Learning Effect

Perceived learning following each intervention session, assessed by the therapist using a numeric rating scale from 0 (no learning) to 10 (complete mastery of key movement principles).

Time frame: Immediately after each intervention period