The purpose of this study is to compare a novel, cost-effective arthroscopic trans-osseous rotator cuff repair technique, known as the 'Grand-Knot' technique, against the standard repair using all-suture anchors. The study evaluates which method provides better functional recovery and structural healing for patients with full-thickness supraspinatus tears. Patients were randomized to receive either the Grand-Knot repair or the standard anchor repair and were followed for a minimum of 2.5 years to assess shoulder function using the ASES score, range of motion, and tendon integrity."
"This prospective randomized comparative study was designed to evaluate the clinical and biomechanical effectiveness of an anchorless trans-osseous repair for rotator cuff tears. Participants: 160 patients (aged 45-75) with full-thickness supraspinatus or posterosuperior tears were enrolled. Interventions: \> 1. Experimental Group: The Grand-Knot technique utilized a 'Giant Needle' to create trans-osseous tunnels, through which sutures were passed and secured using a specialized suture-block (Grand-Knot) on the lateral cortex. 2. Control Group: Standard arthroscopic repair was performed using 2.8 mm all-suture anchors (Y-Knot RC). Procedure: All surgeries were performed arthroscopically by a single senior surgeon. Postoperative rehabilitation was standardized for both groups. Outcomes: The primary endpoint was the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score at 30 months. Secondary endpoints included the Constant score, objective range of motion (ROM) measured by a goniometer, and structural integrity of the tendon as assessed by postoperative MRI or ultrasound at 6 months. Additionally, the study incorporates biomechanical data comparing the load-to-failure strength of both constructs."
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
160
Use of a Giant-needle to create trans-osseous tunnels and securing the tendon with a specialized suture-block (Grand-Knot).
Standard repair using 2.8 mm all-suture anchors placed in the humeral footprint.
Cairo University Hospitals (Kasr Al-Ainy)
Cairo, Egypt
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ASES Score
The ASES score is a standardized clinician-completed and patient-reported instrument consisting of two sections: pain (50%) and activities of daily living (50%). The total score ranges from 0 to 100, where 100 indicates the best possible shoulder function and 0 indicates the worst.
Time frame: 30 months (2.5 years) postoperatively
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.