The purpose of this randomized controlled pilot study is to develop and evaluate an online diagnosis disclosure support intervention for caregivers of 7- to 12-year-old children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in South Korea. This intervention is designed to support caregivers who are contemplating, preparing for, or carrying out disclosure of their child's ASD diagnosis to the child. This study has three primary aims: (1) to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention; (2) to examine clinically meaningful effects of the intervention on caregivers' psychological well-being and psychosocial adjustment (e.g., emotion regulation, loneliness/social isolation, and adaptation to life transitions), parenting competence and attitudes (e.g., parenting self-efficacy, parenting role satisfaction, and parenting stress), and autism-related knowledge and social perceptions (e.g., autism knowledge and perceived autism-related stigma); and (3) to assess whether the effects of the intervention are maintained one month after program completion.
As school-aged children with autism spectrum disorder begin to recognize differences between themselves and their neurotypical peers, they develop questions regarding their identity and belonging. During this critical developmental period, receiving a clear and supportive explanation of their diagnosis can promote self-understanding, encourage self-advocacy, and enhance psychosocial adjustment. However, caregivers often face significant barriers to disclosing the diagnosis, stemming from fear of stigma, uncertainty about appropriate timing and language, and concerns about causing emotional distress. As a result, caregivers may delay or avoid disclosure, despite potential benefits for the child. Therefore, developing evidence-based interventions to support caregivers in diagnosis disclosure is significant, yet few studies offer guidance for caregivers, leaving disclosure decisions and processes largely to individual families. The purpose of this randomized controlled pilot study is to develop and evaluate an online diagnosis disclosure support intervention for caregivers of 7- to 12-year-old children with ASD in South Korea, a developmental period when children go through increasing cognitive, social, and identity-related challenges. This study pursues three objectives: (1) to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of the diagnosis disclosure support intervention; (2) to examine clinically meaningful effects on caregiver's outcomes across domains such as psychological well-being and psychosocial adjustment, parenting competence and attitudes, and autism-related knowledge and social perceptions; and (3) to assess the sustainability of these effects through a one-month follow-up after program completion. 40 caregivers of children with ASD enrolled in mainstream schools (grades 2-6) in South Korea will be recruited and randomly assigned to either an intervention group (n=20) or a waitlist control group (n=20). The intervention group will participate in a five-week, online group-based diagnosis disclosure support program consisting of weekly 60-minute sessions, which will be recorded for fidelity monitoring. The waitlist control group will receive an abbreviated one-session online seminar and program materials upon completion of the final follow-up assessment. Both groups will complete online self-report measures at three timepoints: baseline (T1), immediately following the intervention group's program completion (T2), and at a one-month follow-up (T3). This study holds the potential to improve caregivers' well-being and support healthy family communication by providing evidence-based guidance to facilitate developmentally appropriate disclosure for children with ASD in South Korea.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
40
Our intervention will consist of a five-week, telehealth-based group intervention (60 minutes per week) to support caregivers of children with ASD (7- to 12-year-olds) regarding diagnosis disclosure. This program provides guidance on the rationale for disclosure, strategies for initiating conversations, and the understanding that disclosure is a gradual, lifelong journey. In addition, the program helps caregivers customize disclosure based on their child's development and emotional readiness. The curriculum moves beyond didactic instruction by combining psychoeducation with experiential, participant-centered activities to support practice and application.
The control group will receive a 60-minute telehealth seminar providing a condensed overview of the SHARE program and the complete set of SHARE program materials.
Parental Autism Disclosure Scale (PADS)
The Parental Autism Disclosure Scale (PADS) is a self-report instrument developed in this study to measure the extent to which caregivers of autistic children have considered and prepared for disclosing the diagnosis to their child. The scale consists of 26 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly disagree" (0) to "strongly agree" (4), with reverse-scored items included. Higher total scores indicate greater consideration of and preparedness for disclosing the diagnosis to the child, with total scores ranging from 0 to 104.
Time frame: baseline, immediately after the intervention, 1-month follow-up
Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS)
The Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) will be used to assess decision-making conflict regarding diagnosis disclosure among caregivers of children with autism. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly agree" (0) to "strongly disagree" (4). Total scores and subscale scores are converted to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating greater decisional conflict.
Time frame: baseline, immediately after the intervention, 1-month follow-up
Diagnosis Disclosure Support Intervention Program Acceptability Survey
This will be used to assess whether the intervention program was satisfying and comprehensible to caregivers. Caregivers will respond to approximately 10 items using a Likert-type scale. The survey will include items such as "The program fits the goals of the intervention" and "The skills taught in the program are relevant to my needs."
Time frame: immediately after the intervention
Diagnosis Disclosure Support Intervention Program Feasibility Survey
This will be used to assess whether the intervention program was feasible for the caregivers. Caregivers will respond to approximately 10 items using a Likert-type scale. The survey will include items related to the practicality of the program such as 'Using Zoom for the sessions was easy for me.' and 'The length of each session was manageable.'
Time frame: immediately after the intervention
Participation Survey
A form will be used to record the attendance of the caregivers as a measure of their participation in the intervention program.
Time frame: during each of the five sessions (weeks 1 to 5) in intervention program
Intervention Fidelity Checklist
This will be used to assess whether core elements in each session were delivered to caregivers. Interventionists will record the checklist for each session.
Time frame: every 3 months from the start of the intervention for each therapist
Korean Version of Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (K-ISMI)
The Korean Version of the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (K-ISMI) will be used to measure the level of internalized stigma experienced by caregivers and to assess the impact of stigma on family stress and adaptation. Items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly disagree" (1) to "strongly agree" (4), with reverse-scored items included. Total scores range from 29 to 116, with higher scores indicating a higher level of internalized stigma related to having a child with autism.
Time frame: baseline, immediately after the intervention, 1-month follow-up
Life Transition Scale for Parents of Children with Autism (LTS)
The Life Transition Scale for Parents of Children with Autism (LTS) will be used to assess the emotional responses and psychological adaptation of caregivers of autistic children during the process of recognizing and accepting their child's diagnosis. Items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from "never" (1) to "often" (4), with reverse-scored items included. Evaluation of the transition process is conducted by calculating the mean score for each stage, obtained by dividing the sum of item scores within each stage by the number of items; higher or lower mean scores are then compared across stages.
Time frame: baseline, immediately after the intervention, 1-month follow-up
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ)
The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) will be used to assess how caregivers experience and regulate their emotions in their daily lives. Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly disagree" (1) to "strongly agree" (7). Higher scores indicate greater use of the corresponding emotion regulation strategy.
Time frame: baseline, immediately after the intervention, 1-month follow-up
Autism Stigma and Knowledge Questionnaire (ASK-Q-2)
The Autism Stigma and Knowledge Questionnaire (ASK-Q-2) will be used to assess caregivers' knowledge of and stigma toward autism. Items are scored dichotomously (agree = 1, disagree = 0).
Time frame: baseline, immediately after the intervention, 1-month follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Parenting Sense of Competence (PSOC)
The Parenting Sense of Competence (PSOC) scale is a parent self-report measure used to assess parenting satisfaction and efficacy. Items are rated on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly disagree" (1) to "strongly agree" (6), with reverse-scored items included. Higher total scores indicate greater parental efficacy. Scores of 58 or below are interpreted as low, scores between 58 and 74 as average, and scores of 75 or above as high.
Time frame: baseline, immediately after the intervention, 1-month follow-up
Parent Satisfaction Scale (PSS)
The Parent Satisfaction Scale (PSS) is an instrument that assesses caregivers' subjective evaluation of their performance in the parenting role, as well as the positive and negative emotions arising from their parenting experiences. Items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly disagree" (1) to "strongly agree" (4), with reverse-scored items included. Higher total scores indicate greater satisfaction with the parenting role.
Time frame: baseline, immediately after the intervention, 1-month follow-up
Korean Parenting Stress Index Fourth Edition Short Form (K-PSI-4-SF)
The Korean Parenting Stress Index-Fourth Edition Short Form (K-PSI-4-SF) is a parent self-report measure used to assess parenting stressors and overall levels of parenting stress. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale with varying anchor statements (e.g., from "strongly disagree" (1) to "strongly agree" (5); from "definitely not adequate as a parent" (1) to "a very good parent" (5); and from "much easier than expected" (1) to "much more difficult than expected" (5)). Total scores range from 36 to 180, with higher total scores indicating greater levels of stress experienced in parenting.
Time frame: baseline, immediately after the intervention, 1-month follow-up
UCLA Loneliness Scale-8 (ULS-8)
The UCLA Loneliness Scale-8 (ULS-8) is a self-report measure that assesses the degree and frequency of perceived loneliness and will be used to measure loneliness as a state of extreme distress resulting from relational deficiency. Items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly disagree" (1) to "always" (4), with reverse-scored items included. Total scores range from 8 to 32, with higher total scores indicating higher levels of perceived loneliness.
Time frame: baseline, immediately after the intervention, 1-month follow-up
Loneliness and Social Isolation Scale (LSIS)
The Loneliness and Social Isolation Scale (LSIS) is an instrument designed to estimate the complex construct of social isolation by incorporating both objectively measurable aspects of social networks and individuals' subjective perceptions of social support and loneliness. Items 1 and 2 are rated on a scale ranging from "rarely true" (0) to "very true" (3). Items 3 and 4 are reverse-scored, ranging from "rarely true" (3) to "very true" (0). Item 5 assesses the number of social contacts, scored from "0 persons" (3) to "7 or more persons" (0), and Item 6 assesses time spent in social interaction, scored from "not at all" (3) to "1 hour or more" (0). A total score of 3 or higher on Items 1 and 2 indicates a high risk of loneliness. A total score of 4 or higher on Items 3 and 4, together with a total score of 4 or higher on Items 5 and 6, indicates a high risk of social isolation.
Time frame: baseline, immediately after the intervention, 1-month follow-up