This clinical trial evaluates the safety and feasibility of the A3-Shield implant for stabilising small abdominal aortic aneurysms in adult patients. The study enrolls men and women with small, asymptomatic infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms who are eligible for an elective catheter-based procedure. The trial aims to determine whether implantation of the A3-Shield device is technically feasible and whether it is associated with mechanical immobilization of the aneurysm neck. The study also assesses the peri-procedural and safety profile of the device. Participants will undergo implantation of the A3-Shield device and attend scheduled follow-up visits that include clinical assessments and imaging such as ultrasound and computed tomography. The study does not include randomisation or a separate control group.
Current management of abdominal aortic aneurysms is severely limited by the lack of therapeutic options that can halt the underlying dilating biology. At present, there is no available intervention that can sufficiently intercept the size progression of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. This gap is highly relevant because the vast majority of abdominal aortic aneurysms are detected at a small size, and a substantial proportion of these aneurysms enlarge over the following years and eventually require prosthetic repair, which carries procedure-related and long-term risks. The limited efficacy of endovascular aortic repair in small aneurysms and the significant long-term complications observed in large aneurysms treated by endovascular aortic repair are thought to be related, at least in part, to insufficient control of aneurysm sac expansion. Effective stabilisation of aneurysm size at an early stage therefore represents a major unmet need in abdominal aortic aneurysm management. The A3-Shield implant introduces a new approach to aneurysm treatment by targeting the biomechanical forces that contribute to aneurysm enlargement. Each heartbeat generates aortic pulse waves that propagate along the vessel and induce pulsatile wall motion. As these pulse waves reach the aneurysmal segment, they generate concentrated mechanical stress at the AAA shoulder region. This stress concentration is believed to promote further expansion of the aneurysm. The A3-Shield implant is designed to counteract this mechanism by mechanically immobilizing the aneurysm neck and gradually dampening the transmission of harmful pulse wave forces into the aneurysm sac, thereby aiming to protect the aneurysm from stress-induced enlargement. This first-in-human clinical trial evaluates the safety and feasibility of the A3-Shield implant in adult patients with small infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. The primary objectives are to determine whether the implantation procedure is technically feasible and whether it is associated with suppression of pulse wave transmission at the aneurysm neck. The study also assesses the peri-procedural and safety profile of the device. Participants undergo a catheter-based implantation of the A3-Shield device under fluoroscopic guidance. Following the procedure, they attend scheduled follow-up visits that include clinical examinations and imaging such as ultrasound and computed tomography. The study does not include randomisation or a separate control group. The findings from this pilot phase are intended to support further clinical development and may provide early evidence for a new interventional strategy that addresses an unmet need in the management of small abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
12
Implantation of the A3-Shield Device in the AAA Neck
Еzgu Niyат Llc
Tashkent, Uzbekistan
RECRUITINGPrimary safety endpoint: Absence of Major Adverse Events
Absence of Major Adverse Events (MAEs). MAE is defined as a composite of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, new onset renal failure (requiring dialysis), respiratory failure (requiring mechanical ventilation), paralysis or paraparesis, bowel ischemia requiring surgical intervention or procedural blood loss ≥ 1,000 cc.
Time frame: Within 30 days of the index procedure
Primary effectiveness endpoint: Successful aneurysm treatment
Successful aneurysm treatment defined as the composite of 1. Technical success, defined as successful insertion of the delivery system through the vasculature, successful deployment of the device at the intended location, and successful removal of the delivery system 2. Immobilization of the distal AAA neck, defined as aortic circumferential cyclic strain \< 10% as measured via vascular ultrasound at the conclusion of the index procedure and assessed by an independent core laboratory
Time frame: Conclusion of the index procedure
Secondary safety endpoint: Absence of Major Adverse Events
Absence of Major Adverse Events (MAEs)
Time frame: 180 days, 12 months,vand 24 months post index procedure.
Secondary safety endpoint: Procedure related complications
Procedure related complications
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post index procedure
Secondary safety endpoint: Device related complications
Device related complications. Device related complications are defined as device fracture(s), device migration, and device occlusion requiring intervention.
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post index procedure
Secondary effectiveness endpoint: Freedom of aneurysmal sac enlargement
Freedom of aneurysmal sac enlargement. Enlargement is defined as a maximum diameter increase of \> 5 mm per year, or aneurysm sac volume increase of \> 10% per year, as assessed by CT scans and an independent core laboratory
Time frame: Day 30, 12 months, and 24 months post index procedure
Secondary effectiveness endpoint: Aneurysmal sac shrinkage
Aneurysmal sac shrinkage. Shrinkage is defined as a maximum diameter decrease of \> 5 mm per year, or aneurysm sac volume decrease of \> 10% per year, as assessed by CT scans and an independent core laboratory
Time frame: Day 30, 12 months, and 24 months post index procedure
Secondary effectiveness endpoint: Technical Success
Technical Success, defined as the presence of the device in the intended location and absence of device occlusion as assessed by CT scans and an independent core laboratory
Time frame: Day 30
Secondary effectiveness endpoint: Immobilization of the distal AAA neck
Immobilization of the distal AAA neck, defined as aortic circumferential cyclic strain \< 10% as measured via vascular ultrasound and assessed by an independent core laboratory
Time frame: Day 30, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Secondary effectiveness endpoint: Absence of requirement of AAA repair
Absence of requirement of AAA repair (OR or EVAR)
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post index procedure.
Secondary effectiveness endpoint: Absence of aneurysm related mortality
Absence of aneurysm related mortality
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post index procedure
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.