The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate simplified, shade, non-hybrid composite versus conventional multi Shade nano hybrid composite in class two restorations and reevaluate after one year follow up It's aim to answer Which composite has superior, anatomic form, color, match marginal, integrity, postoperative sensitivity, surface texture, and recurrent caries Researcher will compare the two composites And the participants will Have the restorations in posterior teeth and get a follow up after 12 months
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
50
It's a simplified shade system for dental composite that is nano hybrid with full coverage saline coating and high performance pulverized fillers
Traditional, multi shaded nano, hybrid, composite risen
Marginal adaptation assessed using modified USPHS criteria
Marginal adaptation of the restorations will be clinically evaluated using the Modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria by a calibrated examiner. The scoring system includes the following categories: * Alpha (Score = 1): Excellent marginal adaptation, no visible gap * Bravo (Score = 2): Clinically acceptable marginal discrepancy * Charlie (Score = 3): Clinically unacceptable marginal defect requiring replacement The minimum score is 1 (best outcome) and the maximum score is 3 (worst outcome). Lower scores indicate better marginal adaptation, while higher scores indicate poorer marginal adaptation.
Time frame: At baseline after six months after 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.