TROPIS Versus Coring Out Fistulectomy in High Anal Fistula

Overview

High anal fistulas represent a surgical challenge due to high recurrence rates and risk of postoperative fecal incontinence. Several sphincter-preserving techniques have been developed to address these issues. Coring Out fistulectomy is a traditional sphincter-saving approach, while Transanal Opening of the Intersphincteric Space (TROPIS) is a recently introduced technique with promising outcomes. This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and patient outcomes of TROPIS versus coring out fistulectomy in the management of high complex anal fistulas.

Fistula-in-ano is an abnormal epithelialized tract connecting the anal canal to the perianal skin, most commonly caused by cryptoglandular infection. High anal fistulas, involving more than one-third of the sphincter complex, carry a significant risk of postoperative incontinence when treated with fistulotomy. As a result, sphincter-preserving techniques have introduced. Coring out fistulectomy allows excision of the fistulous tract while preserving sphincter integrity but has variable recurrence rates. TROPIS involves transanal opening of the intersphincteric space with complete preservation of the external anal sphincter and has shown high success rates in recent studies. This prospective randomized clinical trial compares TROPIS and coring out fistulectomy regarding Failure rate (defined as failure of healing or recurrence of anal fistula), operative time, time for wound healing and postoperative complications including fecal incontinence.

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Locations (1)

Outcomes

Central Contacts