The quality of bowel preparation hinges on how well patients follow the prep-drug regimen, so intensive education is essential. Phone calls, texts, short videos, and mini-programs have all been shown to boost compliance and improve prep quality. Still, we also need a way to spot-early-those patients who are likely to prep poorly so we can step in with a rescue plan. In our pilot work the investigators built an AI-assisted mini-program that lets patients photograph their effluent and get an instant quality read-out. The single-center RCT showed excellent performance. Because these findings came from one center, the investigators are now launching a multicenter study to test the tool more broadly. Patients will use the AI mini-program at home; if the algorithm predicts inadequate prep it will prompt them to come in early or alert staff so the investigators can initiate a rescue protocol and, ultimately, improve bowel-cleansing quality.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
524
After taking the bowel-prep solution, patients in the app group are instructed to photograph their final stool in the toilet and upload the image through our smartphone app. The AI algorithm immediately scores the prep quality. If the image is rated "poor" or "inadequate," the app displays an alert advising the patient to come to the hospital early or contact clinical staff; clinical staffs then review the photo and decide whether a rescue preparation is needed. The standard rescue was an additional packet of polyethylene glycol. If the image is rated "adequate," the patient is told the prep is acceptable and should proceed to the appointment, where clinical staffs will use the uploaded photo to confirm eligibility for colonoscopy.
Compare the bowel preparation quality between the app group and the control group.
The rate of adequate and excellent bowel preparation.
Time frame: Periprocedural
Evaluate the diagnostic performance of the app-based assessment.
Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value
Time frame: Periprocedural
cecal intubation rate
Time frame: Periprocedural
cecal intubation time
Time frame: Periprocedural
withdrawal time (excluding polypectomy and biopsy)
Time frame: Periprocedural
polyp-detection rate (PDR), adenoma-detection rate (ADR), advanced-adenoma-detection rate (aADR)
Time frame: Periprocedural
rate of rescue preparation due to inadequate preparation
Time frame: Periprocedural
clinical staffs' assessment time
Time frame: Periprocedural
User satisfaction score
From 0 to 10, 0 stands for the least satisfaction, and 10 stands for the most satisfaction.
Time frame: Periprocedural
post-procedural adverse events
Time frame: From enrollment to 30 days after the procedure.
rate of rescheduled examinations due to inadequate preparation
Time frame: Periprocedural
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.