The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) dermal implant for the correction of nasolabial folds. The study also aims to determine whether the investigational product (FUYANMEI Poly-L-Lactic Acid) is non-inferior to the control product (Sculptra). The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is the effectiveness rate based on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) at 6 months after injection for the investigational group non-inferior to that of the control group? * How does the investigational product perform in terms of global aesthetic improvement as assessed by blinded evaluators and by subjects? * What is the safety profile of the investigational product, including the incidence, severity, and relatedness of adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and device deficiencies (DDs)? Researchers will compare the investigational PLLA implant to an approved PLLA implant using a prospective, randomized, evaluator- and subject-blinded, single-center, split-face controlled study design. Approximately 121 eligible participants will be enrolled. Participants will: * Receive treatment with the investigational product and the control product according to the split-face design * Be followed for 24 months after injection * Return to the clinic at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-injection for follow-up visits * Undergo blinded evaluator assessments of WSRS and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) * Complete subject self-assessments of GAIS and treatment satisfaction * Be monitored throughout the study for adverse events, serious adverse events, and medical device deficiencies
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
121
Poly-L-Lactic Acid
Poly-L-Lactic Acid
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
The responder rate based on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS).
The WSRS responder rate at Month 6 post-injection was compared between the treatment and control groups. A WSRS responder was defined as a participant who achieved an improvement of at least 1 point in the WSRS score compared with baseline.
Time frame: at Month 6 post-injection
Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) scores
WSRS was assessed using a 5-point scale (1-5), with higher scores indicating greater wrinkle severity. Blinded evaluators assessed WSRS scores at baseline, immediately post-treatment (Day 0), and at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 following injection.
Time frame: at baseline, immediately post-treatment (Day 0), and at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 post-injection
WSRS responder rates
WSRS responder rates assessed by blinded evaluators at baseline, Day 0, and Months 1, 3, 12, 18, and 24 post-injection. A WSRS responder was defined as a participant who achieved an improvement of at least 1 point in the WSRS score compared with baseline.
Time frame: at baseline, Day 0, and Months 1, 3, 12, 18, and 24 post-injection
Change in nasolabial fold volume
Images were captured using a VECTRA H2 3D camera (Canfield Scientific) at a fixed distance from the subject's face under standardized lighting and background conditions. The resulting image files were analyzed for volumetric measurements using 3D imaging software. Changes in nasolabial fold volume from baseline (Day 0) were assessed at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 using the three-dimensional imaging system.
Time frame: at baseline, Day 0, and Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 post-injection
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) scores
GAIS scores were measured using a 5-point scale (1-5), with lower scores indicating poorer improvement. Blinded evaluators assessed GAIS scores immediately post-treatment (Day 0) and at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 after injection.
Time frame: at immediately post-treatment (Day 0), and Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 post-injection
Subject-reported GAIS scores
Subject-reported GAIS scores at immediately post-treatment (Day 0), and Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 post-injection.
Time frame: at immediately post-treatment (Day 0), and Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 post-injection
Subject-reported satisfaction scores
Subject-reported satisfaction was assessed at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 post-injection. Participants rated their satisfaction with the treatment's safety and effectiveness using a questionnaire scored on a 5-point scale (1-5), where 5 indicated very high satisfaction and 1 indicated very low satisfaction.
Time frame: at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 post-injection
Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)
The incidence rate of adverse events (AEs), expressed as a percentage, will be calculated based on subjects who reported AEs or whose AEs were observed by investigators. The incidence rate will be determined using the following formula: AE (%) = (number of subjects who experienced AEs in each group ÷ total number of subjects in each group) × 100. Adverse events will be assessed on the day of treatment and at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 post-treatment.
Time frame: at Day 0, Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 post-injection
Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
The incidence rate of serious adverse events (SAEs), expressed as a percentage, will be calculated based on subjects who reported SAEs or whose SAEs were observed by investigators. The incidence rate will be determined using the following formula: SAE (%) = (number of subjects who experienced SAEs in each group ÷ total number of subjects in each group) × 100. Adverse events will be assessed on the day of treatment and at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 post-treatment.
Time frame: at Day 0, Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 post-injection
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.