Robot/Laparoscopic-Assisted Transanal Transection Duhamel Versus Modified Soave Pull-Through for TCA

Overview

Total colonic Hirschsprung disease (TCA) is the most severe form of Hirschsprung disease and is commonly managed with neonatal enterostomy followed by delayed definitive pull-through. Despite widespread use, the optimal reconstructive procedure for TCA remains uncertain. The Duhamel and modified Soave pull-through procedures are the two most frequently adopted techniques, each with distinct theoretical advantages and limitations regarding bowel function, enterocolitis risk, and anorectal physiology. With the increasing application of minimally invasive and robot-assisted surgery, both procedures have been further refined; however, robust comparative evidence, particularly for total colonic disease, is lacking. To date, no multicenter study has provided a detailed comparison of postoperative functional outcomes and Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis between transanal transection Duhamel and modified Soave procedures. This multicenter study compares robot-assisted transanal transection Duhamel and modified Soave pull-through in patients with pathologically confirmed TCA after neonatal enterostomy, focusing on postoperative bowel function and enterocolitis incidence.

Total colonic Hirschsprung disease (TCA), also referred to as total colonic aganglionosis, represents the most severe phenotype of Hirschsprung disease and remains a major surgical challenge. Owing to extensive aganglionosis, poor nutritional status, and high risk of enterocolitis in the neonatal period, the current standard of care in most centers consists of neonatal enterostomy followed by a delayed definitive pull-through as a second-stage procedure. Despite advances in minimally invasive techniques, the optimal reconstructive strategy for TCA has not been established. Among available options, the Duhamel procedure and the modified Soave pull-through are the two most commonly adopted techniques. The Duhamel approach, particularly when combined with a transanal external transection, preserves a retrorectal colonic reservoir, which may reduce anastomotic tension and theoretically improve postoperative bowel function. However, concerns remain regarding fecal stasis, residual spur formation, and the potential risk of postoperative enterocolitis. In contrast, the modified Soave procedure achieves complete endorectal pull-through and eliminates the aganglionic rectal segment, but it may be associated with a higher incidence of anastomotic stricture, cuff-related obstruction, and impaired anorectal motility, especially in patients with extensive disease such as TCA. With the increasing adoption of robot-assisted and laparoscopic techniques, both procedures have been refined; nevertheless, direct comparative data evaluating functional outcomes, Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis, and perioperative parameters between transanal transection Duhamel and modified Soave procedures-particularly in total colonic disease-remain scarce. To date, no multicenter study has provided a detailed, standardized comparison of these two surgical strategies in patients with pathologically confirmed TCA. Therefore, this multicenter study aims to compare robot-assisted transanal transection Duhamel and modified Soave pull-through in patients with total colonic Hirschsprung disease who underwent neonatal enterostomy, with a primary focus on postoperative bowel function and the incidence of Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis.