This study was retrospectively registered. The goal of this single-arm, single-center, prospective clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of autologous apheresis platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia (AGA). The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is apheresis PRP effective in improving hair growth outcomes in male patients with AGA? * Is treatment response associated with key variables, including patient age, number of treatment sessions, baseline severity, and PRP cellular composition? * Does PRP injection lead to any serious adverse events in the treatment of AGA? Researchers will record the effectiveness and adverse events following autologous apheresis PRP treatment for AGA and perform statistical analyses to evaluate treatment outcomes and their correlates with the variables of interest. Participants will: * Receive 3 to 5 sessions of autologous apheresis PRP injections into the scalp at intervals of 3-5 weeks. * Have standardized photographs of the scalp taken from four angles (frontal, vertex, and bilateral sides) prior to each PRP injection. * Attend a follow-up clinic visit or complete a telephone assessment one month after the final PRP injection.
Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is a progressive condition with limited optimal therapeutic options. While platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy has been explored, the apheresis technique offers a distinct method of PRP preparation that yields higher platelet purity and more consistent cellular composition compared to conventional centrifugation methods. This study is specifically designed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of this autologous apheresis PRP and identify key predictors. Given the exploratory nature of this investigation aimed at generating preliminary efficacy and safety data for a specific PRP preparation method, a single-arm design was chosen. The apheresis procedure was performed using a closed-system blood cell separator according to the manufacturer's standardized protocol. All injections were uniformly administered following a strict procedural guideline. The primary endpoint, change in the BASP classification, was assessed by independent, blinded physicians. The associations between treatment response and key variables, including age, number of sessions, baseline severity, and PRP cellular composition were explored through correlation and regression models.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
201
Autologous PRP was prepared using a closed-system blood cell separator with disposable blood cell collection consumables, following the manufacturer's standardized protocol. Using a 30-gauge sterile needle, PRP was administered via intradermal and subcutaneous injections at multiple points across the treatment area, with an injection volume of 0.05 mL per point at intervals of approximately 0.5 cm. Participants received 3 to 5 sessions of autologous apheresis PRP injections into the scalp at intervals of 3-5 weeks.
The General Hospital of Western Theater Command
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Response Based on the Basic and Specific (BASP) classification
The proportion of participants achieving a positive response, defined as an improvement of at least one grade in either the Basic or Specific component of the BASP system, as assessed by blinded, independent physicians on standardized photographs after PRP treatment compared to baseline. As the protocol allows for 3 to 5 injection sessions at intervals of 3 to 5 weeks, the 'End of Treatment' visit occurs on a variable calendar date, falling between Week 9 and Week 25 after the first injection. This design ensures that the assessment captures the cumulative effect of the complete, individualized treatment course for each participant.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-first injection) and End of treatment (pre-final injection, ranging from Week 9 to Week 25)
Patient-Reported Improvement Questionnaire
Patient-reported outcomes will be assessed using a four-item questionnaire covering hair quality, hair thickness, hair loss reduction, and overall satisfaction. Responses are recorded on a 3-point scale: -1 (deteriorated/dissatisfied), 0 (unchanged/neutral), +1 (improved/satisfied). The outcome will be reported as the proportion of participants reporting an improvement (score of +1) for each individual item.
Time frame: At 1 month after treatment completion
Incidence of treatment-related adverse events.
The frequency and severity of all treatment-related adverse events that occur during the treatment and follow-up period. The incidence will be calculated as the number and percentage of participants experiencing at least one treatment-related adverse event, as well as the number of individual adverse event occurrences.
Time frame: From first treatment to 1 month after last treatment, up to 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.