As the professional group that has the most frequent contact with patients, nurses are critical to the sustainability of safe care. Literature demonstrates that nursing practice is prone to error due to heavy workloads, time pressures, complex clinical tasks, inadequate rest, inappropriate working conditions, and the physiological strain of demanding shifts. When these conditions strain both physical and cognitive resources, the risk of errors during treatment administration increases. Medical errors remain one of the most devastating realities of healthcare. Data from the World Health Organization reveals the significant morbidity and mortality caused by errors on a global scale. Numerous studies have demonstrated that student nurses have a significant rate of errors, and those with limited clinical experience are particularly at risk in fundamental areas such as medication administration, asepsis, and patient identification. Increasing patient numbers, short stays, rapid turnover, and the intense pace of clinics negatively impact student nurses' ability to provide safe care, prompting both educators and students to seek stronger pedagogical solutions. This is where simulation-based training comes into play. Simulation is emerging as a contemporary teaching approach that enables students to develop their clinical skills, communication, decision-making, and self-efficacy in a risk-free, safe, and structured environment. It is increasingly being used because it supports knowledge and skill transfer, reduces fear and anxiety, strengthens self-confidence, and provides the opportunity to experience errors. In-situ simulation and standardized patient practice offer strong potential for reducing students' error proneness by providing an experience closest to real-world clinical situations. However, the lack of a study in the literature examining the effects of these two methods, particularly on the medical error proneness and attitudes of final-year nursing students, is a significant gap. This study aims to strengthen a critical area of nursing education. The aim is to evaluate the impact of in-situ simulation and standardized patient practice on final-year nursing students' medical error proneness and attitudes toward medical errors and to reveal how they transform students' competencies in providing safe care.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
81
Group 1 receives training in a simulation laboratory environment using standard patient interventions.
Group 2 receives training in a real hospital setting through on-site simulations and standardized patient interventions.
Adnan Menderes University
Aydin, Turkey (Türkiye)
Medical error tendency scale scores of final-year nursing students
Medical Error Tendency Scale The minimum possible score is 1, and the maximum is 5. While the scale does not have a cutoff point, an increase in the mean score indicates a low tendency for the nurse to make medical errors, while a decrease in the mean score indicates a high tendency to make errors.
Time frame: From registration to week 8 of intervention
Medical error attitude scale scores of final year nursing students
Medical Error Attitude Scale The total scale score is calculated by dividing the total score by the number of items. The cutoff point is set at 3. Healthcare personnel scoring below 3 on the scale are considered incompetent.
Time frame: From registration to week 8 of intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.