This prospective, single-arm feasibility study evaluates the safety, procedural feasibility, and early clinical outcomes of High-Purity Type I Collagen used as an adjunct in arthroscopic meniscal repair. The study aims to generate preliminary clinical, functional, and imaging data to inform the design of a future randomized controlled trial.
Meniscal preservation is critical for long-term knee joint health, yet healing failure remains a concern, particularly in avascular zones. High-Purity Type I Collagen serves as a bioactive scaffold promoting cellular migration and early tissue integration. This study assesses early safety signals, feasibility metrics, patient-reported outcomes, and MRI-based healing characteristics following collagen-augmented meniscal repair.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
18
Standard arthroscopic meniscal repair performed using established techniques (inside-out, outside-in, or all-inside). High-Purity Type I Collagen mesh is trimmed and applied over or within the repair site and secured using sutures or fibrin sealant, according to intra-operative requirements.
Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences
Mandya, Karnataka, India
Safety of High-Purity Type I Collagen Augmentation
Incidence of device-related adverse events, including infection, inflammatory reactions, synovitis, or need for re-operationfollowing collagen-augmented meniscal repair.
Time frame: From surgery to 2 months post-operatively
Pain Reduction Using Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Change in patient-reported knee pain measured using the Visual Analog Scale. Pain intensity was assessed using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain. Lower scores indicate less pain and better clinical status, while higher scores indicate greater pain severity and worse symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, and 8 weeks
Functional Outcome Using IKDC Subjective Knee Score
Change in knee function assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee score, a patient-reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, knee function, and ability to perform daily and sports activities. Scores range from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst possible knee function and 100 represents normal knee function without limitations. Higher scores indicate better knee function, and an increase in score represents clinical improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and 2 months
Functional Outcome Using Lysholm Knee Score
Knee stability and functional performance were evaluated using the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, a validated questionnaire assessing pain, instability, swelling, limp, locking, and stair climbing ability. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better knee function and fewer symptoms. A score of 100 represents optimal knee function, while lower scores indicate increasing levels of impairment. Therefore, an increase in Lysholm score represents clinical improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and 2 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Early Meniscal Healing on MRI
MRI-based assessment of meniscal integrity, signal intensity at the repair site, and presence of fluid clefts or displacement. Participants with non-interpretable or unavailable MRI were categorized as 'Not assessable'.
Time frame: 2 months post-operatively