Evaluation of Treatment Outcomes With Palatal Plate Versus Conventional Tooth Borne Anchorage in Class III Patients

Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls14 enrolled

Overview

evaluation of treatment outcomes with palatal plate versus conventional tooth borne anchorage in class III patients

group (A) patients were treated with transpalatal arch and facemask. group(B) patients were treated by palatal plate and facemask

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

TPA group

palatal plate group

Sex: ALLMin age: 9 YearsMax age: 12 YearsHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * skeletal class III malocclusion deficient maxilla+ growing patient Exclusion Criteria: * adult patient, cleft patient

Faculty of Dentistry , Al Azhar University, Girls Branch, Cairo

Cairo, Egypt

skeletal and dental maxillary changes including SN angle, SNB angle, ANB angle

lateral cephalometry

Time frame: 3-12 months

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.