The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the investigational drug ASO-GNAO1 (Tianasen) in pediatric patients with c.607G\>A mutation in the GNAO1 gene associated with epilepsy and neurodevelopmental disorder. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does intrathecal administration of ASO-GNAO1 slow or halt the progression of motor and cognitive symptoms? 2. Is ASO-GNAO1 safe and well-tolerated in this patient population? 3. What is the appropriate therapeutic dose? This is an open-label study without a placebo control group due to the rare and severe nature of the disease. All participants will receive the active drug. Participants will: Receive escalating doses of ASO-GNAO1 via intrathecal injection over a 12-month period. Undergo frequent neurological assessments, biomarker testing, and safety monitoring.
The variant c.607G\>A in the GNAO1 gene is a gain-of-function (GOF) mutation associated with epilepsy and neurodevelopmental disorder. ASO-GNAO1 (Tianasen) is an investigational antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) therapy designed for the treatment of GNAO1-encephalopathy. Its mechanism of action is allele-specific suppression of the mutant GNAO1 protein expression at the mRNA level. The compound mediates the degradation of mutant mRNA or inhibits its translation, thereby halting the synthesis of the pathogenic protein implicated in disease progression. This targeted suppression is anticipated to mitigate neurodegenerative processes and facilitate partial or complete restoration of neuronal function. The drug candidate was identified through a screening platform analogous to that used for the development of Milasen, an FDA-authorized personalized ASO therapy for Batten disease. In vitro studies have demonstrated that ASO-GNAO1 (Tianasen) achieves approximately 85% suppression of the mutant GNAO1 allele activity (c.607G\>A mutation) while showing no significant effect on the wild-type allele, confirming its allele-specificity. Background and Rationale. GNAO1 encephalopathy is a severe, debilitating monogenic neurodevelopmental disorder of childhood onset, characterized by progressive motor dysfunction and drug-resistant epilepsy and hyperkinesis. Currently, there are no approved disease-modifying therapies, and management is limited to palliative and symptomatic care. The disease course is progressive, leading to severe developmental delay, profound disability, and premature mortality. The rationale for this first-in-human study is to evaluate the potential of ASO-GNAO1 (Tianasen) to alter the natural history of the disease in a population with no alternative effective treatment options. Study Design and Preclinical Rationale. This study constitutes the first human administration of ASO-GNAO1 (Tianasen). It is initiated as an investigational personalized therapeutic development effort for children with a rare monogenic mutation. The preclinical toxicology program supporting this trial included single- and repeat-dose toxicity studies in rats. Doses were administered at three levels (0.2 mg/kg, 0.5 mg/kg, and 1.0 mg/kg) via intrathecal bolus injection five times over a 12-week period. The maximum observation period in the repeat-dose toxicity study was 141 days (20 weeks). The established No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) and the overall design of the abbreviated preclinical package are consistent with the regulatory precedent set by other personalized ASOs, such as Milasen, which was authorized for a single-patient Investigational New Drug (IND) application. Rationale for Dose Selection. The starting dose and escalation regimen for this study are based on an integrated analysis of the preclinical toxicology data, including the determination of the NOAEL and the estimated maximum tolerated dose. Further justification is derived from the known pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of structurally and mechanistically similar ASO compounds approved for intrathecal administration in neurological diseases, notably nusinersen and the personalized therapy milasen. Dosing is designed to remain within the established safety margins while targeting concentrations anticipated to be therapeutic based on preclinical efficacy models
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
5
Intrathecal escalating doses from 0.3 mg/kg to 1.5 mg/kg (single administration per dose level)
Veltischev Research and Clinical Institute for Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Moscow, Russia
RECRUITINGChange in monthly seizure frequency
Change from Baseline in the number of seizure episodes per month. Unit of Measure: seizures per month
Time frame: Baseline to Week 50
Change in total monthly duration of seizures
Change from Baseline in the total duration of seizure episodes per month. Unit of Measure: minutes per month
Time frame: Baseline to Week 50
Change in frequency of non-epileptic hyperkinetic and dystonic episodes
Change in frequency of non-epileptic hyperkinetic and dystonic episodes Unit: episodes per month
Time frame: Baseline to Week 50
Change in duration of non-epileptic hyperkinetic and dystonic episodes
Change in duration of non-epileptic hyperkinetic and dystonic episodes Unit: minutes per month
Time frame: Baseline to Week 50
Change in epileptiform activity index on EEG
Change from Baseline in the quantitative EEG epileptiform activity index. Unit of Measure: percentage of recording time with epileptiform activity Range of Measure: 0-100%, higher value = worse
Time frame: Baseline, Week 46
Change in Barry-Albright Dystonia Scale score
Change in Barry-Albright Dystonia Scale score Unit: score (0-160), higher scores indicate worse dystonia
Time frame: Baseline, Week 46
Change in concomitant medication dosages
Change in total daily medication dose Unit: mg/kg/day
Time frame: Baseline, Week 46
Change in Gross Motor Function Measure-88 total score
Change in Gross Motor Function Measure-88 total score Unit: score (0-100), higher scores indicate better function
Time frame: Baseline, Week 46
Change in Denver Developmental Screening Test developmental age
Change in Denver Developmental Screening Test developmental age Unit: developmental age in months
Time frame: baseline and week 46
Change in Leiter-3 nonverbal IQ score
Change in Leiter-3 nonverbal IQ score. Unit: IQ score (standard score 30-170)
Time frame: Baseline and week 46
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.