The aim of our study is to compare between two techniques used for active SOR. The outcomes include efficiency and safety. Patients with silicon filled eyes and prepared for SOR 540 eyes of 505 patients (one eye in 470 patients, and both eyes in 35 patients) were enrolled in the study. All eyes underwent SOR using 23-Gauge PPV. The eyes were classified according to the surgical technique used for SOR into two groups:- Group A: SOR was performed using SO extraction program built in Optikon vitrectomy device Group B: SOR was performed using modified spring loaded syringe.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
200
Active silicon oil extraction through 23G pars plana system vitrectomy machine
5 mml syringe with spring in its plunger and rubber connection
Sohag Faculty of Medicine
Sohag, Sohag Governorate, Egypt
RECRUITINGIncidence of complications
Incidence of operative and postoperative complications in both groups
Time frame: During the surgical procedure and up to 3 months postoperative
Alaa A A Sinjab, Doctor degree in Ophthalmology
CONTACT
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.