Accurate evaluation of dental pulp health is essential to avoid unnecessary endodontic treatments. In routine dental practice, pulp sensibility is commonly assessed using electric pulp testing and thermal (cold) testing. However, these tests depend on patient perception and may be influenced by various factors such as systemic diseases, nerve damage, anxiety, trauma, or medication use. Diabetic polyneuropathy is a common complication of diabetes mellitus and may alter peripheral nerve function, potentially affecting dental pulp sensibility test responses. This clinical study aims to evaluate how the severity of diabetic polyneuropathy influences dental pulp sensibility responses and masseter inhibitory reflex (MIR) parameters. The MIR is an objective neurophysiological reflex that allows quantitative assessment of trigeminal nerve function. In this study, individuals with mild diabetic polyneuropathy, severe diabetic polyneuropathy, and healthy controls will be evaluated. All participants will undergo electric pulp testing, cold testing, and MIR measurements using standardized protocols. The primary hypothesis of this study is that increasing severity of diabetic polyneuropathy leads to reduced dental pulp sensibility responses and altered MIR parameters compared to healthy individuals. It is further hypothesized that conventional pulp sensibility tests may produce false-negative results in patients with advanced neuropathy. The findings of this study are expected to contribute to more accurate endodontic diagnosis and improved understanding of orofacial neurophysiological changes in diabetic patients.
Accurate assessment of dental pulp health is fundamental for correct endodontic diagnosis and for preventing unnecessary or inappropriate treatment decisions. In routine dental practice, pulp sensibility is commonly evaluated using electric pulp testing (EPT) and thermal (cold) testing. These methods primarily assess neural response rather than true pulp vitality and rely on patient perception, which makes them inherently subjective. Several factors may influence pulp sensibility test outcomes, including systemic diseases affecting peripheral nerves, such as diabetic polyneuropathy, as well as trauma, anxiety levels, medication use, and metabolic disease duration. Diabetic polyneuropathy is a frequent complication of diabetes mellitus and is characterized by progressive sensory nerve dysfunction. This condition may alter trigeminal nerve conduction and pain perception, potentially leading to altered or reduced responses in conventional pulp sensibility tests and increasing the risk of false-negative results. The masseter inhibitory reflex (MIR) is a well-established neurophysiological reflex mediated by trigeminal afferent and efferent pathways and can be objectively recorded using electromyography. Unlike conventional pulp tests, MIR provides quantitative and objective information about orofacial sensory and motor nerve function. However, the relationship between diabetic polyneuropathy severity, dental pulp sensibility responses, and MIR parameters has not been sufficiently investigated. The aim of this clinical study is to evaluate the effect of diabetic polyneuropathy severity on dental pulp sensibility responses and masseter inhibitory reflex parameters. Individuals diagnosed with diabetic polyneuropathy who presented to the Department of Neurology at Bezmialem Vakıf University will be included and categorized into mild and severe neuropathy groups based on neurological evaluation. A healthy control group without systemic or neurological disease will also be included for comparison. A total of 108 participants aged between 25 and 65 years will be enrolled. Demographic and clinical data including age, sex, duration of diabetes, presence of comorbid systemic diseases other than diabetes, and medication use within the last 24 hours will be recorded for all participants. Dental pulp sensibility tests will be performed on the maxillary central incisor. The selected tooth must be free of caries or present only with small, non-extensive restorations, must not have undergone root canal treatment, and must show no clinical or radiographic signs of periapical pathology or periodontal disease. Teeth with extensive caries, restorations, periodontal pathology, or previous endodontic treatment will be excluded. Thermal sensibility will be assessed using a cold test, and both the time to initial sensation and the duration of sensation decay will be recorded. Electric pulp testing will be performed using a standardized protocol, and the response threshold will be recorded as a numerical value on a scale ranging from 0 to 64. All pulp sensibility tests will be conducted under standardized conditions, and patient responses will be documented. Masseter inhibitory reflex recordings will be obtained using electromyography. Electrical stimulation will be applied to the maxillary central incisor using a sterile needle electrode. Surface electrodes will be placed according to standardized neurophysiological protocols to record MIR responses. Participants may experience brief and mild transient sensations during stimulation. All procedures will be explained in detail prior to testing, and participants will be informed that they may request termination of the procedure at any time. If a participant expresses discomfort or wishes to stop, all procedures will be immediately discontinued. The primary hypothesis of this study is that increasing severity of diabetic polyneuropathy is associated with decreased dental pulp sensibility responses and altered MIR parameters compared to healthy controls. It is further hypothesized that conventional pulp sensibility tests may yield false-negative responses in individuals with advanced neuropathy, whereas MIR measurements will provide objective evidence of altered orofacial nerve function. Statistical analysis will be performed using appropriate statistical software. Descriptive statistics will be calculated for all variables. Normality of data distribution will be assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Group comparisons will be conducted using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Kruskal-Wallis test, depending on data distribution. Post hoc analyses will be performed where appropriate. Associations between neuropathy severity, pulp sensibility parameters, and MIR measurements will be evaluated using correlation and regression analyses. A p-value of \<0.05 will be considered statistically significant. The results of this clinical study are expected to improve understanding of the impact of diabetic polyneuropathy on dental pulp sensibility testing and to support the use of neurophysiological assessment methods as complementary tools in endodontic diagnosis. By identifying limitations of conventional pulp tests in diabetic patients, this study aims to contribute to more accurate diagnostic decision-making and improved patient care.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
108
Electrical Pulp Testing Threshold
Electric pulp sensibility will be evaluated using a standardized electric pulp test (EPT) performed on the maxillary central incisor. The tooth will be isolated and dried, and a conductive medium will be applied to ensure proper electrical contact. The EPT probe will be placed on the mid-facial surface of the tooth, and electrical stimulus intensity will be gradually increased according to the manufacturer's instructions. Participants will be instructed to indicate the first sensation perceived during stimulation. The stimulus will be stopped immediately upon participant response. The response threshold will be recorded as a numerical value on a standardized scale ranging from 0 to 64. The test will be repeated after a short recovery period if necessary to confirm reproducibility.
Time frame: The total duration of the EPT procedure is expected to be approximately 2-3 minutes per participant, including tooth isolation, probe placement, gradual increase of electrical stimulus intensity, and recording of the response threshold.
Time to First Sensation During Thermal (cold) Pulp Sensibility Test
Thermal (cold) pulp sensibility will be assessed using a standardized cold test performed on the maxillary central incisor. The tooth will be isolated and dried, and a cold stimulus will be applied to the mid-facial surface using a cotton pellet sprayed with refrigerant (e.g., 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane). The stimulus will be maintained until the participant reports the first sensation. The test will be repeated after an appropriate recovery period to avoid sensitization. The time to first sensation will be recorded in seconds (s).
Time frame: The thermal (cold) pulp sensibility test will require approximately 2-3 minutes, including tooth isolation, application of the cold stimulus, and recording of response times.
Time to Disappearance of Sensation After Thermal (cold) Stimulus Removal
Using the same standardized cold test protocol, thermal (cold) pulp sensibility will be assessed on the maxillary central incisor. The tooth will be isolated and dried, and a cold stimulus will be applied to the mid-facial surface using a cotton pellet sprayed with refrigerant (e.g., 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane). After the stimulus is removed, the time from removal of the cold stimulus to complete disappearance of the sensation will be recorded in seconds (s) to assess pulp sensibility recovery characteristics.
Time frame: The thermal (cold) pulp sensibility test will require approximately 2-3 minutes, including tooth isolation, application of the cold stimulus, and recording of response times.
Masseter Inhibitory Reflex Latency
The masseter inhibitory reflex (MIR) will be recorded using electromyography to objectively assess trigeminal nerve function. Participants will be seated in a comfortable position, and electromyographic electrodes will be placed according to standardized neurophysiological protocols. Electrical stimulation will be delivered to the maxillary central incisor using a sterile needle electrode. The stimulation intensity will be set at 120% of the individual electric pulp test (EPT) sensory threshold. During stimulation, electromyographic activity of the masseter muscle will be recorded, and the latency of the silent periods (SP1 and SP2) will be measured in milliseconds (ms).
Time frame: The total duration of MIR recording, including electrode placement, calibration, and electromyographic data acquisition, is expected to be approximately 10-15 minutes per participant.
Masseter Inhibitory Reflex Silent Period Duration
Using a standardized electromyographic recording protocol, the masseter inhibitory reflex will be recorded to assess trigeminal nerve function. Participants will be seated in a comfortable position, and surface electromyographic electrodes will be placed over the masseter muscle according to established neurophysiological guidelines. Electrical stimulation will be delivered to the maxillary central incisor using a sterile needle electrode. The stimulation intensity will be set at 120% of the individual electric pulp test (EPT) sensory threshold. Following stimulation, the duration of the silent periods (SP1 and SP2) will be measured in milliseconds (ms) to assess inhibitory trigeminal reflex function.
Time frame: The total duration of MIR recording, including electrode placement, calibration, and electromyographic data acquisition, is expected to be approximately 10-15 minutes per participant.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.