Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Currently, the first-line treatment regimen based on R-CHOP can only achieve clinical cure for 50% to 60% of patients. Previous studies have shown that patients with high-risk factors have a poor response to R-CHOP treatment and need further improvement. These high-risk factors include: IPI score ≥2 points, ABC subtype, double-expressing lymphoma, double-hit lymphoma, CD5-positive DLBCL, MCD subtype, N1 subtype, A53 subtype, extranodal lesions ≥2, special site involvement, such as central nervous system CNS, breast, testis, ovary, uterus, bone marrow, vitreoretinal, paraspinal, paranasal sinuses and intravascular, etc. Patients with DLBCL accompanied by high-risk factors also have a significantly increased risk of secondary CNS infiltration during recurrence. In previous RCHOP+X research strategies, only the combination of polatuzumab achieved significant 2-year PFS benefits in the overall population. None of the other studies achieved significant PFS benefits in the overall population. Therefore, the latest version of the CSCO guidelines recommends the Pola-R-CHP regimen as the first-line treatment for primary DLBCL. However, there is still considerable room for improvement in the survival of DLBCL patients with high-risk factors in clinical practice. Therefore, the strategy of the Pola-R-CHP-based combined with X regimen in high-risk DLBCL patients with specific risk factors can be explored subsequently. The Phoenix study for young double expression of lymphoma patients, R - CHOP combined with BTK inhibitors can significantly improve the patient's survival, the subsequent omics data analysis indicates that MCD subtype, N1 subtypes and BN2 subtype can significantly benefit from BTK inhibitors. In addition, given that the proportion of MCD subtypes is high in most extranodal DLBCL patients and secondary CNS involvement is prone to occur, BTK inhibitors can effectively penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and have both preventive and therapeutic effects on CNS lesions. Therefore, exploring the application of BTK inhibitor zanubrutinib combined with R-CHOP or Pola-R-CHP regimens in high-risk DLBCL patients with specific risk factors (or zanubrutinib combined with rituximab and high-dose MTX in primary central nervous system DLBCL) has good application prospects. It is conducive to further improving the prognosis of such high-risk patients. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of the BTK inhibitor zanubrutinib combined with Pola-R-CHP regimen (or zanubrutinib combined with rituximab and high-dose MTX in primary central nervous system DLBCL, etc.) in patients of DLBCL with specific risk factors (IPI score two points or more, ABC subtypes, double expressor lymphoma, double hit lymphoma, CD5 positive DLBCL, MCD subtypes, N1 subtypes, A53 subtypes, extranodal lesions of 2 or more, special locations involved, such as the central nervous system (CNS, breast, testes).
This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of the BTK inhibitor zanubrutinib combined with Pola-R-CHP regimen (or zanubrutinib combined with rituximab and high-dose MTX in primary central nervous system DLBCL, etc.) in patients of DLBCL with specific risk factors (IPI score two points or more, ABC subtypes, double expressor lymphoma, double hit lymphoma, CD5 positive DLBCL, MCD subtypes, N1 subtypes, A53 subtypes, extranodal lesions of 2 or more, special locations involved, such as the central nervous system (CNS, breast, testes).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
50
zanubrutinib combined with Pola-R-CHP regimen: zanubrutinib 160mg bid d1-d21/C1-C6; polatuzumab 1.8mg/kg d1/C1-C6; rituximab 375mg/㎡, iv, d1/C1-C6; cyclophosphamide 750mg/㎡, iv, d1/C1-C6; doxorubicin 50mg/㎡, iv, d1/C1-C6; predinisone 60mg/㎡ d1-5/C1-C6.
Beijing Tongren Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
RECRUITINGBest complete remission rate (CRR)
Response assessment was done after every two cycles of treatment. Best CRR was defined as the CRR during all the six cycles of treatment.
Time frame: From the start of the first cycle of treatment up to 24 weeks (when all six cycles of treatment was completed)
best overall response rate (ORR)
Response assessment was done after every two cycles of treatment. Best ORR was defined as the ORR during all the six cycles of treatment.
Time frame: From the start of the first cycle of treatment up to 24 weeks (when all six cycles of treatment was completed).
Two-year progression free survival (PFS) rate
PFS was caculated from the date of start of treatment to date of disease progression, death of any cause, or last follow-up, whichever came first.
Time frame: From the start of the first cycle of treatment up to 24 months after initiation of treatment for the last enrolled patient.
Two-year overall survival (OS) rate
OS was caculated from the date of start of treatment to date of death of any cause, or last follow-up, whichever came first.
Time frame: From the start of the first cycle of treatment up to 24 months after initiation of treatment for the last enrolled patient.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.