Acute low back pain, the second leading cause of medical consultations in France, poses a major public health challenge, particularly because of its high risk of progressing to chronic low back pain-the leading cause worldwide of years lived with disability. Pharmacological treatments such as paracetamol, opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and muscle relaxants show limited benefit in terms of pain intensity or functional disability. Non-pharmacological treatments, including exercise therapy and psychological support, show promising results but remain hampered by methodological biases and small sample sizes. A biopsychosocial approach that combines pharmacological treatments, physical therapy, psychological support and social interventions has demonstrated moderate improvements in pain and function for chronic low back pain but remains insufficiently studied for acute presentations. French guidelines advocate a combined strategy involving paracetamol, NSAIDs, physical activity and psychosocial risk assessment. However, a French multicentre retrospective study highlighted marked heterogeneity in clinical practice, along with a low adoption rate (\<10 %) of these recommendations in emergency departments, underscoring the need to strengthen adherence to evidence-based management strategies. We hypothesise that a multimodal intervention targeting physicians (guideline reminders) and patients (information on disease progression and multidisciplinary care plans), to enable the systematic implementation of all aspects of a biopsychosocial approach in emergency departments, could reduce short-term pain and disability in patients with acute low back pain.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
782
The biopsychosocial intervention consists of a structured program implemented in participating emergency departments. It includes a standardized 3-hour online training session for physicians covering evidence-based management of acute low back pain, rational pharmacological use, promotion of physical activity, and consideration of psychosocial factors. A summary sheet will be given with key recommendations during the period. For patients, short educational materials provide information on typical recovery, self-management strategies, and appropriate follow-up. The intervention is introduced sequentially across 12 centers according to a stepped-wedge randomization schedule, with each site moving from control to intervention while maintaining standard emergency care.
Pain Interference Score at 7 days
Pain interference score at 7 days, assessed using the Pain Interference subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF). The score is calculated as the mean of 7 items (each rated 0-10) and reported on a 0-100 scale
Time frame: 7 days
Pain intensity at 7 days, measured by the BPI SF intensity score.
Time frame: 7 days
Number of pain-free days after the emergency department visit
Number of days with BPI intensity at 0
Time frame: 7 days
Total amount of opioids consumed
Proportion of patients pain-free at 7 days and at 3 months : Total amount of opioids consumed at 7 days and at 3 months (in morphine equivalent).
Time frame: 7 days and 3 months
Number of days off work
Number of days off work at 7 days and at 3 months.
Time frame: 7 days and 3 months.
Functional disability
Functional disability at 3 months, measured using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.
Time frame: 3 months
Patient satisfaction and quality of life
Patient satisfaction and quality of life at 3 months, assessed using the EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: 3 months
Number of X-rays, CT scans, and MRI scans of the spine performed
Time frame: 3 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.