COMPARISON OF SEVOFLURANE AND PROPOFOL ADMINISTRATION ON POSTOPERATIVE COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION IN SPINAL SURGERY USING THE MINI-MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION (MMSE)

Overview

This study aims to compare the effects of two commonly used anesthetic agents, sevoflurane and propofol, on cognitive function after spinal surgery. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is a common complication following general anesthesia, particularly in complex procedures such as spinal surgery. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) will be used to assess cognitive function before surgery and at multiple time points after surgery (6 hours, 24 hours, 3 days, and 7 days). Twenty patients undergoing elective spinal surgery will be randomly assigned to receive either sevoflurane or propofol anesthesia. Cognitive outcomes will be measured and compared between the two groups. The study will evaluate whether propofol offers better preservation of cognitive function compared to sevoflurane, which has been associated with oxidative stress and hippocampal dysfunction. The results of this study will provide important information for anesthesiologists and surgical teams regarding the choice of anesthetic agents to minimize cognitive decline after spinal surgery, improving patient safety and postoperative recovery.

Background: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is a recognized complication following general anesthesia, particularly in major surgeries such as spinal procedures. POCD can affect memory, attention, and other cognitive domains, impacting patient recovery, quality of life, and independence after surgery. Sevoflurane, an inhalational anesthetic, has been associated with neurotoxic effects including oxidative stress and hippocampal dysfunction, which may contribute to POCD. Propofol, an intravenous anesthetic, exhibits antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties, potentially offering neuroprotective effects. Objective: The primary objective of this study is to compare the incidence and severity of POCD in patients undergoing spinal surgery under sevoflurane versus propofol anesthesia, as assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Methods: This is a single-blind, randomized controlled trial involving 20 adult patients scheduled for elective spinal surgery at Universitas Sumatera Utara / RSUP H. Adam Malik Medan. Patients will be randomly allocated into two groups (n=10 per group) to receive either sevoflurane or propofol for general anesthesia. Cognitive Assessment: MMSE will be administered at the following time points: Preoperatively (baseline) 6 hours postoperatively 24 hours postoperatively 3 days postoperatively 7 days postoperatively Outcomes: Primary Outcome: MMSE score change from baseline at each postoperative time point. Secondary Outcomes: Incidence of mild or moderate POCD, defined according to MMSE decline; comparison of cognitive recovery trends between groups. Statistical Analysis: Descriptive statistics for demographic data. Independent t-tests and chi-square tests to compare cognitive outcomes between groups. Pearson correlation for analyzing associations between variables. Significance threshold: p \< 0.05. Expected Results: It is hypothesized that patients receiving propofol will demonstrate more stable MMSE scores postoperatively, whereas patients receiving sevoflurane may experience significant cognitive decline, particularly at 3 and 7 days after surgery. Significance: The study will provide evidence-based guidance for anesthetic selection in spinal surgery to minimize the risk of postoperative cognitive decline. This may improve patient recovery, satisfaction, and overall outcomes in surgical care. Ethical Considerations: The study has been approved by the Universitas Sumatera Utara Ethical Review Board (No. 88/KEPK/USU/2025). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrollment.