This clinical trial studies how people feel and live during the first two years after being treated for melanoma and whether cognitive behavioral therapy for cancer distress (CBT-C) works to improve quality of life in patients with stage III-IV melanoma. The melanoma survivorship population is rapidly growing, given the increasing survival rates due to treatment advancements. An urgent need to better define and optimize comprehensive quality of life inclusive of mental health (QOL-MH) has been identified. Cognitive behavioral therapy is a type of psychotherapy that helps patients change their behavior by changing the way they think and feel about certain things. CBT-C is a new type of care that helps patients cope with cancer-related stress, which can include problems like trouble sleeping, trouble focusing, or changes in social life and daily activities. Gathering information on how melanoma patients feel and live during the first two years after treatment may help promote improved care and continued scientific advancements in the understanding of melanoma specific QOL-MH and survivorship as a whole, and may also help determine whether CBT-C improves qualify of life in patients with stage III-IV melanoma.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
350
Receive SOC
Attend CBT-C sessions
Ancillary studies
Complete QOL-MH questionnaires
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
RECRUITINGChange in FACT-M total score (Aim 1)
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Melanoma (FACT-M) is a 52-item questionnaire used to measures quality of life (QoL) in melanoma cancer patients. Responses to each item are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). Scores range from 0-108 with higher scores indicating better quality of life. For this study, 8 items have been omitted, so the number of items is 44, with total scores ranging from 0-176. Descriptive statistics will be used to tabulate and graph the observed total scores and the change from baseline total scores over time.
Time frame: Baseline (at enrollment) and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months
Change in FACT-ICM total score (Aim 1)
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Immune Checkpoint Modulator (FACT-ICM) is a 25-item subscale that measures symptom burden and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over the past 7 days in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. Responses to each question are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). Scores range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating greater symptom burden and poorer quality of life. Descriptive statistics will be used to tabulate and graph the observed total scores and the change from baseline total scores over time.
Time frame: Baseline (at enrollment) and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months
Change in Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R) score (Aim 1)
The Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) is a 22-item self-report measure designed to assess subjective distress related to stressful life events. The IES-R consists of 22 items for which participants rate how distressing each difficulty has been during the past 7 days with regard to their cancer diagnosis. Responses are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Extremely). Scores range from 0-88 with higher scores indicating greater distress. Descriptive statistics will be used to tabulate and graph the observed total scores and the change from baseline total scores over time.
Time frame: Baseline (at enrollment) and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months
Change in IES-R score (Aim 2)
The Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) is a 22-item self-report measure designed to assess distress related to stressful life events. The IES-R consists of 22 items which participants rate distress over the past 7 days with regard to their cancer diagnosis. Responses are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Extremely). Scores range from 0-88 with higher scores indicating greater distress.
Time frame: Baseline (at enrollment) and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months
Change in PHQ-8 score
The Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) is a brief, self-report tool used to screen for and measure the severity of depression by asking about 8 depressive symptoms over the past two weeks, scoring from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) for each, with total scores indicating severity (e.g., 0-4 minimal, 10-14 moderate) and a score of 10 or more often suggesting major depression.
Time frame: Baseline (at enrollment) and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months
Change in GAD-7 Anxiety score
The General Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale is used to assess symptoms and feelings of anxiety over the past two weeks. The GAD-7 consists of 7 questions answered on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The total score ranges from 0 to 21 where 0 indicates no anxiety, 1-4 indicates minimal anxiety, 5-9 indicates mild anxiety, 10-14 indicates moderate anxiety, and 15-21 indicates severe anxiety. If patients indicate any problems they are asked to indicate how difficult the problems have made daily life: not difficult at all, somewhat difficult, very difficult, or extremely difficult.
Time frame: Baseline (at enrollment) and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months
Change in PSQI score
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)measures the severity of sleep disturbances. Possible scores range from 0 to 21 with higher scores indicating a worse outcome/more severe symptoms of sleep disturbance.
Time frame: Baseline (at enrollment) and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months
Change in PROMIS: Fatigue score
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Fatigue questionnaire, a subscale of the PROMIS-29, measures fatigue and related symptoms over the past seven days. It consists of four items rated on a scale of 1(not at all) to 5 (very much). A higher score indicates greater experience of fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline (at enrollment) and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months
Change in PROMIS: Pain Interference score
The PROMIS: Pain Interference questionnaire, a subscale of the PROMIS-29, is used to assess pain interference in daily life over the past seven days. It consists of four items rated on a scale of 1(not at all) to 5 (very much). A higher score indicates greater levels of pain interference.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Baseline (at enrollment) and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months
Change in COST-FACIT score
The Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity-Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COSTFACIT) measures financial toxicity among cancer patients. This measure reflects five themes of financial toxicity which include: financial, resource, affect, coping, and effect on family. It consists of 12 questions, each answered on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much), with higher scores indicating greater financial toxicity.
Time frame: Baseline (at enrollment) and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months
Change in MEPS score
The Medical Expenditures Survey (MEPS) measures the financial impact of cancer, its treatment, or the lasting effects of that treatment. It consists of 5 multiple choice questions, including free text/ / fill-in options where appropriate. Results are reported descriptively. .
Time frame: Baseline (at enrollment) and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months