This study aims to evaluate the effect of a structured education program delivered in primary health care settings on parents of children aged 0-2 years. The education focuses on childhood vaccination and related health perceptions. Parents will receive education covering childhood vaccines, vaccine hesitancy, evaluation of vaccine-related information obtained from digital sources, eco-anxiety, and perceived vulnerability to diseases. The study examines whether this education influences parents' levels of vaccine hesitancy, digital vaccine literacy, eco-anxiety, and perceived vulnerability to diseases. The findings are expected to contribute to the development of effective educational interventions in primary health care services to support informed parental decision-making regarding childhood vaccination.
Childhood vaccination is one of the most effective and cost-efficient public health interventions for preventing infectious diseases. However, vaccine hesitancy among parents has emerged as a significant public health concern, particularly in the context of misinformation disseminated through digital media. Parents' attitudes toward vaccination are influenced not only by face-to-face communication with health professionals but also by their ability to access, evaluate, and use vaccine-related information from online sources. In addition, environmental concerns and climate-related health risks have increased levels of eco-anxiety, which may influence individuals' perceptions of vulnerability to diseases and health-related decision-making. This study is designed as a quasi-experimental, pre-test-post-test, control-group study to evaluate the effect of a structured education program delivered in primary health care services on parents of children aged 0-2 years. The study will be conducted at a Family Health Center in Van, Türkiye. Parents who meet the inclusion criteria and provide written informed consent will be enrolled in the study. Participants will be assigned to either an intervention group or a control group. Parents in the intervention group will receive a structured education program consisting of three face-to-face sessions delivered once per week, with each session lasting approximately 30-40 minutes. The education program includes: (1) childhood vaccines, vaccine hesitancy, and common misconceptions; (2) digital vaccine literacy, reliable information sources, and coping with misinformation; and (3) eco-anxiety, environmental health concerns, perceived vulnerability to diseases, and coping strategies. The control group will receive routine services provided by the Family Health Center and will not receive any additional educational intervention. Data will be collected using validated self-report instruments administered before the intervention and 15 days after completion of the final education session. The primary outcomes include changes in vaccine hesitancy, digital vaccine literacy, eco-anxiety, and perceived vulnerability to diseases. Sociodemographic information will also be collected. All data will be collected through face-to-face interviews in a private setting, and participant confidentiality will be ensured by using coded identifiers instead of personal information. The study aims to determine whether education provided within primary health care services can effectively improve parents' attitudes and perceptions related to vaccination and child health. The results are expected to inform future public health education strategies targeting parents during early childhood.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
140
A structured education program consisting of three face-to-face sessions delivered once per week in a primary health care setting. Each session lasts approximately 30-40 minutes and focuses on childhood vaccination, vaccine hesitancy, digital vaccine literacy, eco-anxiety, and perceived vulnerability to diseases.
Van Yuzuncu Yil University
Van, Van, Turkey (Türkiye)
Vaccine Hesitancy Level
Change in parents' level of vaccine hesitancy measured using the Parent Vaccine Hesitancy Scale. The scale consists of 10 items and 2 subdimensions, with items 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7 reverse-coded. It includes the Lack of Confidence subdimension (items 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8) and the Risks subdimension (items 5, 9, and 10). The scale is rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), and the total score is calculated by summing the item scores; higher total scores indicate lower levels of vaccine hesitancy.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and 15 days after completion of the education program
Digital Vaccine Literacy Level
Change in parents' digital vaccine literacy level measured using the Digital Vaccine Literacy Scale. The scale consists of a total of 7 items and 3 subdimensions: trust in and understanding of official information (items 1-2), trust in and understanding of information on social media (items 3-4), and evaluation and application of online vaccine information (items 5-7). Each item is rated on a four-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The total score ranges from 7 to 28, with higher scores indicating a higher level of digital vaccine literacy.
Time frame: Baseline and 15 days after completion of the education program
Eco-Anxiety Level
Change in parents' eco-anxiety level measured using the Hogg Eco-Anxiety Scale (HEAS-13) The scale consists of 13 items and four subdimensions (anxiety symptoms, rumination, behavioral symptoms, and concern about personal impact), with each item rated on a five-point Likert scale (0 = not at all, 1 = some days, 2 = most days, 3 = nearly every day). Higher scores on the scale indicate higher levels of eco-anxiety.
Time frame: Baseline and 15 days after completion of the education program
Perceived Vulnerability to Disease
Change in parents' perceived vulnerability to disease measured using the Perceived Vulnerability to Disease Scale. The scale consists of a total of 15 items and two subdimensions: Perceived Infectability (items 2, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14) and Germ Aversion (items 1, 3, 4, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 15). Items 3, 5, 11, 12, 13, and 14 are reverse-scored. The total score obtainable from the scale ranges from 7 to 105. The scale is structured as a seven-point Likert type, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree), and higher scores indicate a higher perceived vulnerability to diseases.
Time frame: Baseline and 15 days after completion of the education program
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.