The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether adding Integrated Decoding and Encoding instruction to the ALLSTAR literacy program improves reading outcomes for students with significant literacy and communication needs. The study will also examine how students' reading skills change over time across instructional conditions. The main questions it aims to answer are: Do students who receive ALLSTAR with Integrated Decoding and Encoding instruction demonstrate greater improvements in literacy outcomes than students who receive ALLSTAR as standard care alone? How do students' literacy skills change from baseline to mid-intervention and post-intervention across the two instructional conditions? Researchers will compare two groups using a randomized controlled trial design. One group will receive 60 lessons of ALLSTAR as the standard of care (ALLSTAR-SC), and the other group will receive 60 lessons of ALLSTAR with the addition of Integrated Decoding and Encoding lessons (ALLSTAR-I\*). Literacy outcomes will be measured using repeated assessment probes at baseline (0 Lessons), after 30-40 lessons, and after 60 lessons to evaluate differences between groups and changes over time in the individuals.
Literacy skills enhance public health outcomes (employment, safety, well-being, and social engagement). Additionally and critically, for individuals who cannot speak and use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC; pointing to pictures, using a speech generating device), literacy skills support precise communication by allowing individuals to spell the exact words they wish to communicate. However, over 90% of AAC users leave high school illiterate. The long-term goal for this project is improve language and literacy outcomes in individuals who use AAC, consequently improving health and well-being outcomes. While recent research underscores the importance of explicit literacy instruction that integrates decoding and encoding, encoding is rarely taught to AAC users, and it is not yet known if this approach will yield better language and literacy outcomes among AAC users. The focus of the current proposal is to teach decoding and encoding using an integrated approach to instruction with an existing literacy curriculum, ALLSTAR. ALLSTAR and approaches using the ALL app have resulted in learning across all AAC users, with large to very large effect sizes observed (Tau-U ranges: .63 - 1.0) and large gains (+44% on pre-post ELA assessment). The project goal is to: (1) adapt and evaluate the effect of an integrated approach in an AAC literacy intervention on CVC decoding and encoding using an iterative single subject design; (2) evaluate the effect of adding the integrated "spell-to-read" approach to ALLSTAR using an RCT (N=60); and (3) assess the acceptability, feasibility, and adoptability of the literacy lessons by practitioners, in order to understand the barriers and facilitators that influence their uptake, ultimately increasing the use of evidence-based literacy instruction for AAC users. Data measurements related to the respective aims above, include: (1) percent gains and intervention effectiveness, (2) gains on Pre, Mid, and Post scores on Early Literacy Assessment (letter-sounds, sound blending, phoneme segmentation, decoding, irregular sight words, and encoding); and (3) thematic analysis and scores on the Feasibility Adoption Acceptability Questionnaire (FAAQ), completed at three timepoints throughout each study. Our expected outcome is the development of an effective and adoptable literacy intervention for children who use AAC. The significance of this work is that it will advance a new intervention paradigm for AAC users that capitalizes on an explicit connection between literacy and communication to foster AAC users who can communicate orthographically and ultimately more precisely what they wish to express. This proposal is timely, in that it is responsive to NIDCD's mission and responsive to and collaborative with AAC users. The project has the potential for high clinical impact in changing poor literacy outcomes for a population that is unjustly denied evidence-based literacy instruction.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
60
The ALL app comes with lessons in early literacy skills, with three tiers of lessons available. Both intervention groups will use ALLSTAR materials, including an implementation binder and the ALL app. Both intervention groups will also receive daily instruction by a trained service provider (\~30 mins. Per day). Additionally, in support of best practices, both groups will receive phonics instruction and use of explicit and systematic instruction for four skills per day and 50 trials per lesson. Lessons will differ based on skills targeted.
The Pennsylvania State University
State College, Pennsylvania, United States
Percent correct on Early Literacy Assessment (ELA)
Early Literacy Assessment (ELA) is a 120 question measure that covers six literacy skills. It was specifically created for a population with minimal or no speech. The ELA will be used to assess progress in domains of: letter-sound correspondence, sound blending, decoding, grapheme-phoneme typing, and encoding.
Time frame: At study completion of the required 60 lessons, an average of 5 months
The difference between the two literacy interventions for individuals who have minimal or no speech
Scores from the Early Literacy Assessment (ELA) will be analyzed in this secondary outcome measure to look at the difference between the two interventions. The ELA has 120 questions. The total scores on ELA between the two interventions will be compared using independent t-tests and Cohens D.
Time frame: After study completion, an average of 5 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.