Radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) is one of the most common thoracic-radiotherapy complications, with an incidence as high as 31.4 %. Multiple studies have shown that RILI can adversely affect patient prognosis by disrupting treatment schedules. Moreover, the widespread clinical use of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has further increased pulmonary toxicity when radiotherapy (RT) is combined with ICIs. Checkpoint-inhibitor-related pneumonitis (CIP)-i.e., immune-mediated lung injury-may necessitate permanent discontinuation of ICIs, diminish survival benefit, and, in severe cases, directly threaten life. The diagnosis of both RILI and CIP is based on an integrated assessment of subjective symptoms and imaging findings.RILI typically occurs 1-3 months after completion of radiotherapy, whereas CIP may emerge at any point during treatment. The two entities share similar clinical presentations: fever, dry cough, chest tightness, dyspnoea, and pleuritic chest pain. Computed tomography (CT) is the most sensitive imaging modality. Pulmonary-function testing is another routinely used clinical metric; vital capacity, total lung capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁), and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) may all decline, with DLCO being the most sensitive parameter. In advanced cases, arterial oxygen and carbon-dioxide tensions may also deteriorate.Currently, RILI is managed empirically with systemic corticosteroids and supportive care; however, this approach yields limited improvement in diffusing capacity or ventilatory function, and its ability to prevent radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis (RPF) remains undefined. Corticosteroids also remain the mainstay of CIP therapy. Pirfenidone, a potent cytokine inhibitor, attenuates fibroblast activity by reducing production of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and fibroblast growth factor (FGF), thereby suppressing fibroblast proliferation and extracellular-matrix collagen synthesis. Pre-clinical efficacy studies have demonstrated robust anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, and anti-fibrotic effects in the lung.Because RILI and pneumonitis arising from combined radio-immunotherapy are often indistinguishable in clinical practice, and because both share pathogenetic features with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), the investigators initiated this phase II/III trial to address the unmet medical need for effective therapy. Building on prior pre-clinical and clinical data, the study aims to establish the optimal dose of pirfenidone capsules for RILI with or without concomitant CIP and to confirm efficacy and safety.Phase II (dose-finding): The study consists of a screening period (Day -28 to Day -1), a 168-day treatment-observation period (Day 1-Day 168), a safety follow-up (28 ± 7 days after the last dose), and subsequent disease-progression and survival follow-up. Ninety subjects with RILI, with or without CIP, who meet all eligibility criteria will be randomly assigned 1:1:1 to low-dose pirfenidone (400 mg TID), high-dose pirfenidone (600 mg TID), or matching placebo.Phase III (confirmatory): The dose of pirfenidone capsules for phase III will be determined jointly by the sponsor and investigators based on accumulated efficacy and safety data. The trial structure mirrors phase II: screening (Day -28 to Day -1), 168-day treatment-observation (Day 1-Day 168), safety follow-up (28 ± 7 days after the last dose), and disease-progression and survival follow-up. Eligible subjects with RILI ± CIP will be randomized 1:1 to receive either pirfenidone capsules (400 mg or 600 mg TID, taken with meals) or identical placebo. After completion of the 28-day post-treatment follow-up, all phase III participants will enter an extension phase for long-term survival assessment every 3 months (± 7 days).This trial will investigate the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) associated with pirfenidone capsules in patients with Grade 2 and 3 radiation-induced lung injury (RILI), with or without chemotherapy-induced pneumonitis (CIP).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
298
Low-dose group:400 mg, TID
Pirfenidone Capsules(600mg,TID)
Placebo(0mg,TID)
Anhui Provincial Chest Hospital
Hefei, Anhui, China
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Cancer Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Xiehe Branch
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
Lanzhou University First Hospital
Lanzhou, Gansu, China
Phase II and Phase III: The absolute value of the change in the predicted percentage of lung carbon monoxide diffusion capacity (DLCO% predicted) from the baseline at week 24.
DLCO% is a core indicator for evaluating pulmonary gas exchange function, reflecting the efficiency of oxygen transfer from the alveoli into the bloodstream. It is crucial for the diagnosis and prognosis of interstitial lung disease, pulmonary vascular disease, and similar conditions. DLCO% = measured diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide ÷ predicted value × 100%. Absolute value change refers to the direct difference between two consecutive measurements (for example, a decrease from 65% to 55% represents an absolute value change of -10%).
Time frame: At the 24th week of the experiment
Phase II and Phase III: The absolute values of the changes in DLCO% at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 16 compared to the baseline.
Time frame: At weeks 2, 4, 8 and 16 of the trial
Phase II and III: Compared with the baseline, the changes in the measured values of pulmonary carbon monoxide diffusion capacity (DLCO) (in units of liters [L]) at weeks 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24.
Time frame: At weeks 2, 4, 8,16 and 24 of the trial
Phase II and Phase III: Changes in forced vital capacity (FVC) (in liters) from baseline at weeks 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24.
Time frame: At weeks 2, 4, 8,16 and 24 of the trial
Phase II and Phase III: The absolute value changes of forced vital capacity as a percentage of the predicted value (FVC%) from baseline at weeks 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24.
Time frame: At weeks 2, 4, 8,16 and 24 of the trial
Phase II and Phase III: Changes in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (in liters) from baseline at weeks 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24.
Time frame: At weeks 2, 4, 8,16 and 24 of the trial
Phase II and Phase III: The absolute value of the change in forced expiratory volume in one second as a percentage of the predicted value (FEV1%) from baseline at weeks 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24.
Time frame: At weeks 2, 4, 8,16 and 24 of the trial
Phase II and Phase III: Changes in FEV1/FVC from baseline at weeks 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24.
Time frame: At weeks 2, 4, 8,16 and 24 of the trial
Phase II and Phase III: Changes in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores from baseline at weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24.
The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score is the standard instrument for assessing health-related quality of life in patients with chronic airway diseases. It comprises 76 items grouped into three domains-symptoms, activity, and disease impact. Each domain score and the overall total score are scaled from 0 to 100: 0 denotes "complete absence of symptoms or limitation," whereas 100 indicates "maximal severity." Higher scores signify a greater adverse effect of the disease on daily life.
Time frame: At weeks 4, 8,16 and 24 of the trial
Phase II and Phase III: Changes in cough score from baseline at weeks 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24.
The cough score is a subjective instrument that quantifies the frequency, intensity, and disruptive impact of cough on daily activities and sleep into a 0-10-point or 0-100-mm scale; zero denotes complete absence of cough, and higher values indicate increasing symptom severity.
Time frame: At weeks 2, 4, 8,16 and 24 of the trial
Phase II and Phase III: Changes in the Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (mMRC) score at weeks 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 compared to the baseline.
The Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (mMRC) is a five-level instrument that rapidly quantifies the extent to which breathlessness limits physical activity; higher grades indicate greater disability.
Time frame: At weeks 2, 4, 8,16 and 24 of the trial
Phase II and Phase III: Compared with the baseline, the changes in computed tomography (CT) imaging scores at weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24
CT imaging score is a standardized method that converts anatomical or functional features observed on CT scans into quantifiable numerical values, used for disease diagnosis, staging, treatment response monitoring, or prognostic assessment.Referring to the HRCT scoring system, the scores were assigned by imaging experts after consensus , with higher values generally indicating more severe disease.
Time frame: At weeks 4, 8,16 and 24 of the trial
Phase II and Phase III: The proportion of subjects with CIP at baseline who discontinued immunotherapy and experienced immune reactivation during the study period.
Time frame: Within 24 weeks
Phase II and Phase III: The proportion of subjects whose lung injury grade decreased by at least one level compared to the baseline at week 24.
According to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 5.0, pulmonary injury is graded, with higher grades indicating more severe symptoms.
Time frame: Within 24 weeks
Phase II and Phase III: The proportion of subjects achieving a lung injury level of ≤ 1 at the 24th week compared to the baseline.
According to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 5.0, pulmonary injury is graded, with higher grades indicating more severe symptoms.
Time frame: Within 24 weeks
Phase II and Phase III: The time required for the subjects to first achieve a lung injury level of ≤ 1.
According to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 5.0, pulmonary injury is graded, with higher grades indicating more severe symptoms.
Time frame: Within 24 weeks
Phase II and Phase III: The proportion of subjects who experienced their first acute pulmonary deterioration or died for any reason within 24 weeks of treatment.
Acute pulmonary deterioration is defined as the unexplained worsening or new onset of cough, dyspnea, hypoxia, or pneumonia from the completion of initial treatment up to Week 24, persisting for \>4 days, with chest CT showing new or increased diffuse pulmonary infiltrates in the absence of pneumothorax or pleural effusion, and after exclusion of pneumonia, congestive heart failure, pulmonary embolism, or cancer progression. Pulmonary deterioration occurring within the first 2 weeks after initial treatment is not counted toward the endpoint, allowing full resolution of initial symptoms.
Time frame: Within 24 weeks
Phase II and Phase III: Analyze the blood drug concentration of pirfenidone capsules, evaluate the steady-state blood drug trough concentration for individual patients and each group of people at specific treatment time poin
Time frame: on days 1, 14, 28, 56, 112, and 168 of the trial
Phase II and Phase III: Analyze the blood drug concentration of pirfenidone capsules, evaluate the PopPK characteristics for individual patients and each group of people at specific treatment time poin
Time frame: on days 1, 14, 28, 56, 112, and 168 of the trial
Phase II and Phase III: Adverse events/serious adverse events (AE/SAE).
Adverse Event (AE) refers to any untoward and unintended medical occurrence experienced by a trial participant during treatment or clinical investigation, regardless of causal relationship to the investigational product. Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is a subset of AE that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, causes persistent or significant disability/incapacity, leads to congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is judged medically important by the investigator. According to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 5.0, pulmonary injury is graded, with higher grades indicating more severe symptoms.
Time frame: Within 24 weeks
Phase II and Phase III:Number of participants with abnormal ECG readings
Time frame: At weeks 2, 4, 8,16 and 24 of the trial
Phase II and Phase III: vital signs( blood pressure).
Record patient's systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Time frame: At weeks 2, 4, 8,16 and 24 of the trial
Phase II and Phase III: vital signs(pulse rate).
Time frame: At weeks 2, 4, 8,16 and 24 of the trial
Phase II and Phase III: vital signs(body temperature).
Time frame: At weeks 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 of the trial
Phase II and Phase III: vital signs( respiratory rate data).
Time frame: At weeks 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 of the trial
Phase II and Phase III: laboratory tests(complete blood count).
Time frame: At weeks 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 of the trial
Phase II and Phase III: Number of participants with abnormal urinalysis
Time frame: At weeks 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 of the trial
Phase II and Phase III: Number of participants with abnormal laboratory tests results (blood biochemistry)
Time frame: At weeks 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 of the trial
Phase II and Phase III: Number of participants with abnormal laboratory tests results (coagulation function)
Time frame: At weeks 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 of the trial
Phase II and Phase III: laboratory tests( pregnancy test for safety assessment).
Time frame: At weeks 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 of the trial
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Foshan First Hospital
Foshan, Guangdong, China
Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Panyu Central Hospital Affiliated to Guangzhou Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Southern Medical University - Southern Hospital
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
...and 26 more locations