The rapidly evolving world has influenced the sleep-wake cycles of nursing students, shifting them towards an evening chronotype. This shift has negatively impacted their daytime functionality, motivation, and academic success. Moreover, research indicates that there is an asynchrony between individuals' circadian rhythms and face-to-face classes. Flipped learning can be seen as a potential solution to nursing education. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of chronotype on motivation and academic achievement in nursing students trained with two different learning approaches.
This study were conducted a randomized controlled experimental design incorporating pre-test and post-test follow-ups. The study sample consisted of volunteer nursing students at the nursing department of a university in western Turkey. In this department, an internship program is offered and the Fundamentals of Nursing course, which is designed to provide 5 hours of theoretical instruction and 8 hours of practical training during the spring semester. The theoretical parts of the courses are conducted in lecture halls using a traditional classroom approach, while the practical parts are carried out in laboratories and clinics. As part of the course, after the instructor delivers the theoretical lecture, students watch videos related to the topic in the lecture hall to enhance their psychomotor skills. The application steps are then explained, followed by hands-on practice in the laboratory. G\*Power 3.1 software was utilized for the power analysis of the study. Based on the study by Aksoy and Gurdoğan, with an effect size of 0.79, a power of 95%, and a significance level of 0.05, it was determined that a minimum of 43 students should be assigned to each group. However, considering a 20% loss rate during the study, it was decided to include at least 52 students in each group. The students were randomly divided into two groups, the experimental and control groups, using the simple randomization method with the Research Randomizer program. A total of 114 students who met the study criteria were assigned to the experimental and control groups, with 57 students in each group. However, three students in the experimental group were excluded from the study because they participated in the training but did not complete the post-training data collection forms. Thus, the study was completed with a total of 111 students, including 57 in the control group and 54 in the experimental group. Turkish version of Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire and Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire, and theory and skill exams specific to urinary system were used for data collection.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
111
The experimental group students were taught the topic titled "Urinary System Applications" based on the FCA. The link to the online education platform required for out-of-class learning in this approach was shared with the students two weeks before the start of the course. Thus, students were able to watch the videos anytime and anywhere at their convenience. The educational platform included 31 videos on urinary system practices, specially prepared by researchers based on Bloom's taxonomy. These videos were organized into 31 sequential and thematically cohesive parts, and each part was interconnected. The student could not watch a subsequent part without completing the previous related part. Each video was 10-15 minutes long, with one video introducing the online platform, 27 videos covering the theoretical aspects of the subject, and 3 videos focusing on skill application. Specific questions tailored to the learning outcomes of the subject were embedded in each video. Access to the
The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ)
The questionnaire was developed by Pintrich et al. in 1991.24 It was adapted to Turkish language by by Büyüköztürk et al. in 2004. This scale allowing students to indicate how well the items describe their personal situation. This scale consists of two main section, learning strategies and motivation, and 15 sub-dimensions. Responses are provided on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from "not at all true of me" to "very true of me". In this study, the motivation section with its 6 sub-dimensions were applied to the students. Each sub-dimension is scored separately, and increasing scores indicate increased student motivation.
Time frame: Before courses begin and 15 days after the courses concluded, an average of 7 weeks
The Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ)
The self-assessment-based form was developed by Horne and Östberg in 1976. The Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted by Pündük et al. in 2005. The form, which is used to determine morningness and eveningness types in the human circadian rhythm, consists of 19 questions. The minimum score that can be obtained from the form is 16, while the maximum score is 86. Based on the total score, individuals are classified as evening type, intermediate type, and morning type. While the Cronbach's alpha value was reported as 0.81 in the study by Pündük et al., it was found to be 0.72 in this study.
Time frame: Before courses begin and 15 days after the courses concluded, an average of 7 weeks
The theoretical exam
The theoretical exam was developed by the researchers based on the guidelines and standards outlined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A detailed rubric evaluation was utilized to score student responses. The exam included four open-ended questions. The exam content included questions about the steps of urinary catheterization, types of urinary incontinence and their nursing care, urinary tract infections associated with urinary catheters, and a case study.
Time frame: 15 days after the courses concluded, an average of 7 weeks
The skill exam
The skill exam was conducted using a urinary catheterization skill checklist, which consisted of 40 steps and specified the score for each step, prepared based on the literatüre. Both the theoretical and skill exams were graded on a 0-100 scale and were conducted 15 days after the courses concluded. The evaluation were carried out by an independent faculty member who was blinded to the group assignments (experimental or control).
Time frame: 15 days after the courses concluded, an average of 7 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.