Background: SGLT2 inhibitors reduce CHF morbidity/mortality but are underutilized in elderly patients with acute decompensated CHF (ADCHF) admitted outside cardiology departments. Objective: Assess feasibility of early ED-initiated gliflozin therapy in elderly ADCHF patients. Design: Multicenter, randomized, open-label pilot study; N=144 patients (72 per arm) across 6 EDs over 30 months. Population: Age ≥75 years, ED admission for ADCHF (symptomatic worsening, congestion, elevated natriuretic peptides), gliflozin-naïve, requiring hospitalization. Key Exclusions: Type 1 diabetes, eGFR \<25 mL/min/1.73m², cardiogenic shock, recent ACS, cardiology ward admission. Intervention: Treatment: Dapagliflozin 10mg daily within 24h + cardiac nurse telephone follow-up at 1 month Control: Standard care only Primary Outcome: Feasibility (organizational implementation, acceptability, protocol adherence, timeline compliance). Follow-up: 7-day visit (clinical assessment, NT-proBNP, echocardiography) and 3-month cardiology consultation (mortality, rehospitalization, QoL, biomarkers, safety parameters).
Rationale: Chronic heart failure (CHF) in elderly patients is associated with increased mortality, rehospitalization risk, and significant quality of life impairment. SGLT2 inhibitors (gliflozins) have demonstrated efficacy in reducing morbidity and mortality in stabilized CHF patients when initiated 24-72 hours after emergency department (ED) admission in cardiology units. However, most elderly CHF patients presenting to the ED with acute decompensation are hospitalized in non-cardiology departments and do not receive optimal therapeutic management including gliflozins, despite their potential significant benefit in this population. Hypothesis: Early initiation of gliflozins in the ED setting, without waiting for cardiology consultation, could avoid potential delays in optimal treatment for elderly patients with acute decompensated chronic heart failure (ADCHF). Study Design: This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group feasibility pilot study conducted over 30 months (including 12 months of recruitment) across 6 hospital emergency departments in France. The study will evaluate the overall feasibility of early ED initiation of gliflozins plus telephone follow-up compared to standard care in elderly patients admitted for ADCHF who are not previously treated with gliflozins.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
144
Early initiation of dapagliflozin 10mg daily within 24h of ED admission
Telephone follow-up by cardiac nurse practitioner at 1 month
Standard acute decompensated heart failure care
Organizational feasibility: Implementation of procedures
Successful implementation of study procedures (yes/no). Binary assessment of whether study procedures were successfully implemented at each site.
Time frame: 3 months
Organizational feasibility: Patient flow assessment
Proportion of eligible patients successfully enrolled. Ratio of patients enrolled to patients screened, expressed as percentage.
Time frame: 3 months
Acceptability: Number of refusals
Number of patients refusing participation. Total count of eligible patients who declined to participate.
Time frame: 3 months
Acceptability: Reasons for refusal
Categories of refusal reasons. Qualitative categorization of stated reasons for study refusal.
Time frame: 3 months
Protocol adherence: Attrition rate
Proportion of participants completing the study protocol. Percentage of enrolled patients who complete all protocol requirements without withdrawal.
Time frame: 3 months
Protocol adherence: CRF completion rate
Case report form completion rate. Percentage of required case report form fields completed across all participants.
Time frame: 3 months
Protocol adherence: Telephone follow-up success rate
Proportion of patients successfully contacted by telephone at 1 month. Percentage of intervention group patients successfully reached for telephone follow-up by cardiac nurse practitioner.
Time frame: 1 month
Timeline adherence
Study timeline compliance (yes/no). Binary assessment of whether study met anticipated timeline for recruitment and follow-up phases.
Time frame: 3 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.