Real-World Comparison of Chemo-Immunotherapy Regimens in Metastatic NSCLC With PD-L1 <50% (ALCG-01)

Overview

Patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression below 50% are commonly treated with different chemo-immunotherapy regimens in routine clinical practice. Although these regimens are widely used, comparative real-world data on survival outcomes and patient-reported quality of life are limited. This prospective observational study aims to compare two commonly used treatment approaches in patients with metastatic NSCLC and PD-L1 expression \<50%: chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined with chemotherapy. Patients will receive treatment according to routine clinical decisions made by their treating physicians; no treatment assignment or intervention will be performed as part of the study. The primary outcomes of the study are progression-free survival and overall survival. In addition, health-related quality of life will be assessed using validated patient-reported outcome questionnaires during routine follow-up. Exploratory analyses will examine treatment outcomes in relation to selected clinical and patient-related factors, such as biological age, antibiotic exposure, and dietary patterns, in subsets of patients with available data. The results of this study are expected to provide real-world evidence on survival and quality of life outcomes associated with commonly used chemo-immunotherapy strategies in metastatic NSCLC.

This is a prospective, observational cohort study conducted in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression below 50% who are treated in routine clinical practice. Eligible patients will receive systemic treatment according to standard-of-care decisions made by their treating physicians. Two commonly used treatment approaches will be observed: chemotherapy combined with pembrolizumab, and nivolumab plus ipilimumab administered in combination with chemotherapy. No randomization, protocol-driven treatment assignment, or experimental intervention will be performed as part of the study. The primary objectives of the study are to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two treatment approaches. Survival outcomes will be assessed using standard clinical and radiological follow-up data collected during routine care. Secondary objectives include the evaluation of health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes. Quality of life will be assessed using validated questionnaires administered during routine follow-up visits, including global quality of life, functional status, cognitive function, and psychological well-being. In addition to the primary and secondary objectives, exploratory analyses are planned to investigate the association between treatment outcomes and selected patient-related factors. These include biological age metrics, exposure to antibiotics during treatment, and dietary patterns assessed through patient questionnaires. These analyses will be conducted in subsets of patients with available and complete data for the relevant variables. As an observational real-world study, missing data are anticipated for some variables, particularly patient-reported and lifestyle-related measures. All analyses will be performed using appropriate statistical methods, and results from exploratory analyses will be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. This study is designed to provide prospective real-world evidence on the comparative effectiveness and patient-reported outcomes of widely used chemo-immunotherapy regimens in metastatic NSCLC patients with PD-L1 expression below 50%.