This study aims to evaluate the soft tissue response and prosthetic complications associated with three different types of provisional prostheses used in immediate loading full-arch implant prosthetic treatment. The patients are randomly assigned to the three groups to compare the clinical outcomes and determine which provisional prosthesis provides better soft tissue health and fewer prosthetic complications
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
10
patients received 3D printed provisional full arch prosthesis after implant placement
patients received bar reinforced 3D printed provisional full arch prosthesis after implant placement
patients received Milled PMMA provisional full arch prosthesis after implant placement
Mansoura university faculty of dentistry
Al Mansurah, Egypt
clinical evaluation of dental implant (bone Level)
Evaluation included alveolar bone level around implant which is evaluated using periapical x-rays comparing T0 (at implant insertion) to T1 ( at one and half month) and T2 (at three months ) measuring amount of bone resorption around implant
Time frame: 3 months
modified plaque index
the Modified Plaque Index (MPI) to assess peri-implant biofilm at four surfaces using scores from 0 (no plaque) to 3 (abundant plaque) using periodontal probe.
Time frame: 3 months
the Modified Gingival Index (MGI)
evaluate peri-implant soft tissue inflammation, scored from 0 (healthy mucosa) to 3 (severe inflammation)
Time frame: 3 months
peri-implant probing depth (PD)
measured with pressure-sensitive probes, where an increase over time indicates possible bone loss, with an ideal sulcus depth of less than 5 mm to allow effective oral hygiene
Time frame: 3 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.