The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of collecting synchronised continuous temperature data using wearable devices and a continuous core temperature reference under real-world conditions. The study focuses on workflow execution, data continuity, secure retrieval, and time-alignment without diagnostic or therapeutic intent.
Continuous temperature monitoring in real-world and free-living settings is operationally challenging due to intermittent standard measurements and context-dependent variability. This limits the ability to evaluate the integrity and stability of continuous temperature time-series and to test end-to-end data collection workflows. This feasibility study is conducted to determine whether synchronised continuous temperature data from wearable devices and an ingestible core temperature reference can be collected, time-aligned, and retrieved reliably with acceptable participant and staff burden. The study generates feasibility evidence on workflow performance and data stability to inform the design of a subsequent confirmatory clinical investigation.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
12
Participants wear investigational temperature sensors and ingest a core temperature capsule continuous data collection
University Hospital Basel
Basel, Switzerland
Paired Continuous Temperature Data Completeness
Participant-level paired data completeness (%) over the planned monitoring period, defined as the proportion of monitoring minutes with usable and time-aligned temperature data from both the wearable device(s) and the ingestible capsule.
Time frame: Baseline to 48 hours
Recruitment and Retention Feasibility
Proportion of eligible participants enrolled among those approached and proportion of enrolled participants completing the planned monitoring period.
Time frame: Baseline to 48 hours
Data continuity (wearable data)
Percent expected time with usable wearable data
Time frame: Baseline to 48 hours
Data continuity (wearable data)
Categorised reasons for missing/invalid data
Time frame: Baseline to 48 hours
Data continuity (capsule data)
frequency/duration of gaps
Time frame: Baseline to 48 hours
Data continuity (capsule data)
Percent expected time with usable capsule data
Time frame: Baseline to 48 hours
Data continuity (capsule data)
Categorised reasons for missing/invalid data
Time frame: Baseline to 48 hours
Time-alignment success between wearable and capsule streams
Success rate of time synchronisation
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Baseline to 48 hours
Time-alignment success between wearable and capsule streams
Distribution of residual alignment error after the defined alignment procedure (reported descriptively).
Time frame: Baseline to 48 hours
Data retrieval workflow
Success rate of secure data retrieval/transfer
Time frame: Baseline to 48 hours
Data retrieval workflow
Number of troubleshooting events
Time frame: Baseline to 48 hours
Data retrieval workflow
Time spent per participant
Time frame: Baseline to 48 hours
Tolerability Questionnair
Participant-reported tolerability and wear adherence assessed by a questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline to 48 hours
Tolerability: skin discomfort
Incidence and nature of wearable skin discomfort
Time frame: Baseline to 48 hours
Tolerability: GI discomfort
Capsule-related GI discomfort/delayed excretion (descriptive)
Time frame: Baseline to 48 hours
Observed temperature trajectories
Descriptive summaries of temperature time courses; whether transient elevations \>38.0°C were captured
Time frame: Baseline to 48 hours
Baseline factors considered (descriptive stratification only)
Age and sex will be explored descriptively as potential drivers of data quality metrics
Time frame: Baseline to 48 hours
Baseline factors considered (descriptive stratification only)
Age and sex will be explored descriptively as potential drivers of observed temperature dynamics.
Time frame: Baseline to 48 hours