The recent development and market introduction of small diameter implantable defibrillation leads able to deliver left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has opened the possibility of achieving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using a single- or dual-chamber implantable-cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). This approach may reduce the number of intracardiac leads required and, consequently, has the potential to lower both procedural and long-term complication rates. However, the integration of these leads into currently recommended CRT strategies remains hypothetical. The FORGE CSP registry will prospectively enroll patients with an indication for CRT in whom implantation of a LBBAP ICD lead is attempted.
The FORGE CSP Registry is a prospective, multicentre and nationwide, post-approval registry, including consecutive patients with an indication for CRT and in whom implantation of a LBBAP ICD lead is attempted as a first line strategy. The primary objective of this registry is to measure the proportion of patients who achieve effective CRT solely through the use of a LBBAP ICD lead (plus right atrial lead if appropriate). The secondary objectives of this registry are: (1) to assess the feasibility of the LBBAP ICD lead implantation (regarding LBBAP validated electrophysiologic criteria) and the associated learning curve; (2) to evaluate the incidence of implantation of a third lead, namely a left ventricular lead positioned in the coronary sinus, in combination with the LBBAP ICD lead (LOT-CRT); (3) to assess the risk of complications related to the use of the LBBAP ICD lead, including its impact on tricuspid valve function, the risk of lead dislodgement, and other procedure- or device-related complications; (4) to evaluate de cost-effectiveness of CRT using LBBAP ICD lead, compared with conventional CRT; (5) and to compare CRT response in LBBAP ICD lead recipients, versus historical cohort of conventional CRT.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
200
Caen University Hospital
Caen, France
LBBAP ICD lead CRT efficacy
Proportion of patients with an effective CRT (defined by LBBAP validated ECG criteria) using solely the LBBAP ICD lead (plus right atrial lead if appropriate).
Time frame: 0 - 3 Months
LBBAP ICD lead implantation feasibility
Incidence of successful LBBAP ICD lead implantation (defined by LBBAP ECG validated criteria)
Time frame: Procedural
LOT-CRT utilization
Incidence of coronary sinus left ventricular lead implantation (in addition to LBBAP ICD lead)
Time frame: Procedural
Safety of LBBAP ICD lead
Incidence of ICD lead micro or macro-dislodgment Incidence of de novo tricuspid regurgitation (grade \> or = 3) Incidence of loss of CRT (based on LBBAP validated ECG criteria)
Time frame: 0 - 3 Months
Cost-effectiveness
Comparaison of device-associated costs in LBBAP ICD lead recipients and conventional CRT recipients.
Time frame: Procedural
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.