This study evaluates whether a procedure using a new wireless heart sensor patch is equal to or better than the standard hospital procedures and equipment at detecting an irregular heartbeat called Atrial Fibrillation (AF) after an ischemic stroke. Atrial fibrillation is a major cause of stroke, but it can be difficult to catch because it often comes and goes. The study will include approximately 450 adults who have had a stroke or a transient "mini-stroke" (TIA) within the last two weeks. Participants will be assigned by chance (randomized) to one of two groups: * Group 1 (Intervention): Participants wear the "ECG247 Smart Heart Sensor." This is a small patch that sticks to the chest and connects to a smartphone. It is worn continuously for up to 14 days, even after leaving the hospital. * Group 2 (Standard Care): Participants receive the standard hospital check-up. This typically involves using a "Holter monitor" (a device with wires and electrodes) for a period of about 24 to 48 hours some time after leaving the hospital. The main goal is to see if the procedure using the patch is equal to the standard procedure in detecting atrial fibrillation in participants. The study will also measure how quickly doctors can start the correct medication and how easy the patients find the devices to use.
Background and Rationale Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major risk factor for ischemic stroke, yet it often goes undetected due to its paroxysmal (intermittent) nature. While guidelines recommend prolonged heart rhythm screening after a stroke of undetermined cause, standard hospital practice often relies on short-term telemetry and ambulatory Holter monitoring. These standard methods can be limited by device availability, bulkiness, and short monitoring duration (typically 24-48 hours), potentially leading to under-diagnosis of AF. This study aims to evaluate the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of a novel, continuous patch ECG system (ECG247) initiated in the hospital setting compared to standard care. Study Design This is a prospective, randomized, parallel-group, open-label (no masking) study conducted at a single stroke center. Approximately 450 eligible patients will be enrolled. Recruitment and Stratification Patients admitted with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the last two weeks are screened for eligibility, aiming for inclusion within 48 hours of admission. Participants are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention arm or the standard care arm. Randomization is stratified by age into three groups: 18-64 years, 65-74 years, and ≥75 years. Intervention Arm (ECG247 Smart Heart Sensor) Patients in this group will have the ECG247 patch applied to the anterior chest wall while in the hospital. * Device: The ECG247 is a wireless, water-resistant patch sensor that connects to a dedicated smartphone application via Bluetooth. It transmits data to a secure cloud service for analysis. * Duration: The device is worn continuously for up to 14 days. Monitoring begins in-hospital and continues after discharge. * Analysis: The system utilizes an algorithm to detect arrhythmia. Episodes of AF \>30 seconds are considered positive findings. Study personnel and physicians verify algorithm-detected episodes. * Concurrent Care: These patients also receive standard in-house telemetry per hospital protocol while admitted. Control Arm (Standard Care) Patients in this group receive standard heart rhythm monitoring according to current hospital guidelines. * In-hospital: Monitoring via continuous telemetry or intermittent ECGs based on availability and clinical priority. * Ambulatory: Upon discharge, patients are referred for ambulatory Holter monitoring. The duration is typically 24-48 hours as decided by the treating cardiologist. * Analysis: Holter recordings are analyzed by trained technicians and reviewed by a cardiologist. Biomarker Analysis Blood samples will be collected from all participants to analyze N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels. The study will assess the association between NT-proBNP levels and the detection of silent AF to evaluate its potential for risk stratification. Outcomes and Follow-up * Primary Outcome: The detection rate of AF (defined as episodes ≥30 seconds). * Secondary Outcomes: Time to AF detection, time to initiation of anticoagulation therapy, total monitoring duration, and health economics. * User Experience: Patients in the intervention group will complete Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) regarding usability and satisfaction. * Long-term Follow-up: Participants will be followed for up to 12 months to assess clinical endpoints, including secondary stroke, TIA, and major bleeding.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
450
This study aims to evaluate the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of a novel, continuous patch ECG system (ECG247) initiated in the hospital setting compared to standard care.
Patients in this group receive standard heart rhythm monitoring according to current hospital guidelines.
Sørlandet Sykehus HF
Kristiansand, Norway
RECRUITINGDetection rate of atrial fibrillation
The detection rate of AF (defined as episodes ≥30 seconds). Analysis will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis, and AF detection will be primarily assessed for its non-inferiority and secondarily for difference in proportions. An interim analysis for efficacy measures will be performed using the O'Brien-Flemming correction for the primary endpoint AF detection rate after 72 and 144 participants in each arm.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of heart rate monitoring. Will also be registered on follow up after 12 months.
Time from enrollment to treatment initiation with anticoagulant medicine
Days from enrollment until AF detection results in change of prophylactic treatment, defined as prescribed anticoagulant medication collected by the patient, retrieved from e-prescription data accessed through the Summary Care Record (Kjernejournal).
Time frame: From enrollment until end of follow up (12 months after enrollment).
Time from enrollment to detection of first AF episode
Time to detection of first episode of atrial fibrillation after hospital admission
Time frame: From enrollment up to 1 year
Total duration of heart rate monitoring
Total duration of heart rate monitoring, also including an assessment of device signal quality for assessment
Time frame: From enrollment up to 1 year
Numbers of participants with secondary stroke/TIA and/or major bleeding
Assessing secondary stroke and major bleeding at 1 year of follow-up
Time frame: From enrollment to one-year follow up, assessed at 1-year follow up.
Explore the practical utility in regards to validity of results of AF screening after a stroke with a patch ECG
Inter-rater validity of ECG results between the ECG247 algorithm, cardiologists and neurologists
Time frame: After 1 year of recruitment
Explore the practical utility of time consumed using AF screening after a stroke with a patch ECG
A suitable number of observations will be performed to evaluate the time needed to complete the patch ECG attachment and inform the patient, interpret the results and follow-up of results
Time frame: After 1 year of recruitment
Explore the practical utility and reliability of AF screening after a stroke with a patch ECG
Reliability of the monitoring device in crude versus interpretable monitoring duration in hours. Reliability will be assessed by the study personnel when creating the patch ECG result record. The whole pulse rate strip will be analyzed to identify periods of 1\>h with a lack of signal or reduced signal quality. The total monitoring duration registered by the algorithm in hours versus manual interpretation with readable signal in hours will be evaluated as a percentage: Useable monitoring time/Total monitoring time x 100% = Percentage of useful monitoring.
Time frame: Assessed at 1 year after enrollment start
Explore the practical utility and patient satisfaction of AF screening after a stroke with a patch ECG
Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) to all patients in interventional arm within a month of discharge and within 1 month of Holter completion for control arm, registration of technical problems, allergic reactions to patch, photo of patch placement and registration of patients not considered eligible to the study due to lack of smartphone and other causes not listed in the exclusion/inclusion criteria. PREMS will be reported by a 7 point Likert scale, with higher values indicating a high level of satisfaction.
Time frame: Through study completion
Diagnostic quality of in-house patch ECG compared to telemetry
Sensitivity and specificity of AF detection in patch ECG compared to concomitant telemetry. Assessment of detection of other dangerous arrhythmias in patch ECG compared to telemetry. Quality of signal from telemetry compared to patch ECG. In the subgroup of patients where patch ECG and telemetry are worn simultaneously, the results of both methods will be cross-validated against each other
Time frame: From start of enrollment until discharge of last included patient
Cost effectiveness of patch ECG compared to standard care
Cost-effectiveness analysis of patch ECG and standard care with the endpoint being reduced secondary stroke
Time frame: From enrollment until end of follow up.
Assess predictors of silent AF
Association between clinical, radiological and laboratory factors (including) NT-pro-BNP level and AF NT-proBNP will be assessed upon inclusion and can be analyzed from blood samples drawn on day 1 after admission. MRI results Echocardiography results CHADSVASC, age, gender, medication used, previous diseases, BMI
Time frame: From enrollment until end of patient follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.