Tubeless Strategy for Enhanced Recovery After Sublobar Resection

Overview

This is a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial conducted at a single center. The study aims to evaluate whether a "tubeless" strategy can enhance recovery for patients undergoing minimally invasive thoracoscopic sublobar resection (wedge or segment resection) for small lung nodules. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: * The experimental group will receive the "tubeless" strategy, which includes non-endotracheal intubation anesthesia (using a laryngeal mask) and no routine chest tube drainage after surgery. * The control group will receive the traditional strategy, which includes double-lumen endotracheal intubation anesthesia and routine chest tube drainage. The main goal is to compare the rate of achieving high-quality fast-track recovery at 24 hours after surgery between the two groups. This study will provide evidence on whether the tubeless approach can help patients recover faster and more comfortably without compromising safety.

This is a prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Adult patients (aged 18-75) scheduled for uniportal VATS sublobar resection for peripheral lung nodules (≤2 cm, ≤2 cm from the pleura) will be assessed for eligibility. Key exclusion criteria include severe pleural adhesions, inability to achieve selective lung ventilation, and severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction. The primary outcome is a composite endpoint measuring the rate of high-quality fast-track recovery at 24 hours postoperatively, defined as simultaneously meeting all three criteria: 1) meeting standardized discharge criteria, 2) a QoR-15 (Quality of Recovery-15) score ≥130, and 3) absence of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥II respiratory adverse events until the first follow-up. Secondary outcomes include individual components of the primary endpoint, pneumothorax rate, postoperative pain scores, time to first ambulation, length of hospital stay, hospitalization costs, and patient satisfaction. A sample size of 138 participants (69 per group) was calculated to provide sufficient statistical power. Data analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle.