In this single-center,open-label, phase I study, the safety and efficacy of PIN in combination with anti-programmed cell death -1 (anti-PD1) antibody therapeutic regimen (sintilimab) will be evaluated in patients with advanced proficient mismatch repair/microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC) with hepatic metastases . A total of 25 to 30 patients are planned to be enrolled and receive PIN plus sintilimab combined treatment. It aims to: 1).assess the safety and antitumor effects of the above combined treatment regimen. 2).detect the dynamic changes and molecular characteristics of PIN induced CD8+ T cells with special phenotype in peripheral blood (PB) and transformation of tumor microenvironment (TME) after the treatment with PIN. 3).evaluate the immunological or clinical predictive biomarkers for toxicity and efficacy.
Over 40% of CRC patients experience liver metastasis during the course of the disease, and up to 50% present with unresectable disease. Without surgical intervention or in cases of postoperative recurrence, survival for patients treated with systemic therapies alone is dismal,especially those with pMMR/MSS (who are almost unresponsive to anti-PD1 antibody treatment). Several clinical studies have found that oncolytic viruses (OVs) can provide clinical benefits to patients with various malignant tumors, including primary and metastatic liver tumors.In recent years, new generations of OVs developed or in clinical stages have shown better safety and stronger anti-tumor capabilities. Through genetic engineering, OVs can express target genes that have anti-tumor effects, such as granulocyte-macrophage colonystimulating factor (GM-CSF), interleukin-12(IL-12),etc, further enhancing their anti-tumor effects. Despite these advances, how to obtain a more durable antitumor immune response and long-term benefits is still an urgent clinical issue. Previous studies have confirmed that the newcastle disease oncolytic virus (NDV) can selectively infect tumor cells while sparing normal cells, demonstrating an acceptable safety profile. In this study, investigators have developed a nove PIN . Preclinical studies and clinical studies conducted in patients with refractory advanced primary hepatocellular carcinoma have both shown that combining PIN with anti-PD1antibody therapy can reverse the immunosuppressive microenvironment and transform "cold" tumors into "hot" tumors, thereby triggering local and systemic anti-tumor immune responses and significantly improving the efficacy of the immune checkpoint inhibitor(ICI). Based on these findings, investigators are conducting this clinical trial to evaluate the safety and anti tumor activity of the PIN and sintilimab combination therapy in patients with advanced pMMR/ MSS CRC with hepatic metastases. In this study, 25 to 30 subjects with advanced pMMR/ MSS CRC with hepatic metastases will be enrolled. The initial dose for the first cycle will be determined as 4e9 or 8e9 viral particles based on the number of injectable lesions, their longest diameter, and the tumor volume capacity. Following the first cycle of treatment, the subsequent dose and injection sites of PIN will be adjusted based on the permissible volume of the injected tumor mass, according to the following principles: PIN injection frequency: day 0 and day 3, per 3 weeks for 8 cycles; unless unavailability of injection lesion, disease progression (PD) or serious intolerable adverse events (AEs). PIN injection dosage: 1. a.For patients with a single injectable lesion with a maximum diameter of \<5 cm, the initial cycle's PIN dose is 4e9 viral particles. Subsequent cycles will maintain this dose of 4e9 or increase it to 8e9 viral particles based on the lesion's capacity to accommodate the injection volume; b. For patients with a single injectable lesion with a maximum diameter of ≥5 cm, the initial cycle's PIN dose is 8e9 viral particles. Subsequent cycles will maintain this dose of 8e9 viral particles based on the lesion's capacity to accommodate the injection volume. 2. a.For patients with two injectable lesions, injections will alternate between the two lesions after two cycles. The initial cycle's PIN dose is 4e9 viral particles, and the second cycle will maintain this dose of 4e9 or increase it to 8e9 viral particles based on the tumor volume's capacity; b.For patients with injectable lesions with a maximum diameter of ≥5 cm, the initial cycle's PIN dose is 8e9 viral particles, and subsequent cycles will maintain this dose of 8e9 or decrease it to 4e9 viral particles based on the lesion's capacity. 3. a.For patients with multiple injectable lesions (≥ 3), after 1-2 cycles of injections in each injectable lesion, injections are alternated between lesions. The initial injection dose for each lesion is determined by the size of the lesion; b.For lesions \<3 cm, the initial cycle's dose is 4e9 viral particles, and the second cycle will maintain this dose of 4e9 or increase it to 8e9 viral particles based on the tumor volume's capacity; c.For lesions ≥3 cm, the initial cycle's injection dose is selected as 8e9 viral particles, and subsequent cycles will maintain this dose of 8e9 or decrease it to 4e9 viral particles based on the tumor volume's capacity. 4. After injections, if the tumor shrinks by 0.5-1 cm in diameter, the injection dose should be adjusted to 2e9 viral particles until the tumor disappears. Anti-PD1 infusion frequency: day -3, per 3 weeks for 8 cycles; until unacceptable toxicity occurred or PD. Objectives: The primary objective are to assess the safety and adverse event profile of the combination regimen. The coprimary objective is immune response, assessed by CD8+T cells with special phenotype by Fluorescence Activating Cell Sorter (FACS). The secondary objectives are to evaluate disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and quality of life.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
25
1.Initial treatment phase: PIN injection frequency: day 0 and day 3, per 3 weeks for 8 cycles; PIN injection dosage: Cycle1: 4e9 or 8e9 viral particles based on the number of injectable lesions, their longest diameter, and the tumor volume capacity . Cycle 2\~8: 4e9 or 8e9 viral particles based on the tumor volume's capacity.Sintilimab: day -3, per 3 weeks for 8 cycles; 2.Maintenance treatment phase: No injection lesion: Sintilimab: day 1, per 3 weeks till 2 years unless PD or serious intolerable AEs. Have injection lesion: PIN: 4e9 or 8e9 viral particles based on the tumor volume's capacity, per 6 weeks (within first 24 weeks), then per 8 weeks till 2 years unless unavailability of injection lesion, PD or serious intolerable AEs.Sintilimab: day 1, per 3 weeks till 2 years unless PD or serious intolerable AEs. 3.Salvage treatment phase: Dosage and frequency of administration refer to the initial treatment phase and maintenance treatment phase.
Biotherapeutic Department and Hematology Department of Chinese PLA General Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Incidence of treatment-related AEs.
Treatment-related AEs are defined as any adverse medical events occurring since the initiation of treatment and grading these toxicities by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) V5.0.
Time frame: Up to 12 months since the initiation of treatment.
DCR
DCR includes complete response (CR) ,partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD) defined by investigators according to Immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (iRECIST) criteria or modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (mRECIST) criteria.
Time frame: Up to 2 years since the initiation of treatment.
ORR
ORR includes CR and PR defined by investigators according to iRECIST or mRECIST criteria.
Time frame: Up to 2 years since the initiation of treatment.
DOR
DOR is defined as the date of their first CR or PR (which is subsequently confirmed) to PD assessed by investigators, or death regardless of cause.
Time frame: Up to 5 years since the initiation of treatment.
PFS
PFS is defined as the time from the initiation of treatment to the date of PD assessed by investigators, or death any cause. Participants not meeting the criteria for progression by the analysis data cutoff date were censored at their last evaluable disease assessment date.
Time frame: Up to 5 years since the initiation of treatment.
OS
OS is defined as the time from the initiation of treatment to the date of death. Subjects who have not died by the analysis data cutoff date will be censored at their last contact date.
Time frame: Up to 5 years since the initiation of treatment.
Quality of Life Assessment.
Quality of life will be evaluated by European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-Core 30 (C30) a core scale for all cancer patients, with a total of 30 items. Among them, items 29 and 30 are divided into seven levels. Based on the responses of the subjects, they are scored from 1 to 7 points. Other items are divided into four levels: never, a little, quite a bit, and a lot. When scoring, directly assign a score from 1 to 4 points.The researchers will assess changes in quality of life by calculating total scores.
Time frame: Every 6 weeks up to 2 years since the initiation of treatment.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.