This prospective cohort study evaluates dental students' self-assessment of clinical endodontic performance and compares it with independent evaluations conducted in a dental education clinical setting. Endodontic treatments are performed by undergraduate dental students using two distinct rotary file systems selected according to routine clinical practice. Students' self-assessments are prospectively collected using a structured questionnaire and compared with evaluations performed by two experienced evaluators with access to clinical and radiographic information, considered the reference standard, as well as by two different experienced evaluators using radiographic information only. Secondary analyses examine whether assessment outcomes differ according to the rotary file system used. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between dental students' self-assessments and reference standard evaluations of endodontic treatment quality, and that assessment outcomes do not differ according to the rotary file system used.
This prospective cohort observational study examines dental students' self-assessment of clinical endodontic performance in a dental education clinical setting and compares these assessments with independent evaluations. Endodontic treatments are performed by undergraduate dental students as part of routine clinical practice under standard supervision. Treatments are carried out using one of two distinct rotary file systems selected according to routine clinical practice, without assignment by the study protocol. Following completion of each endodontic treatment, operators prospectively complete a structured self-assessment questionnaire evaluating the quality of their clinical performance. These self-assessments are compared with evaluations performed by experienced external evaluators. Two experienced evaluators assess each case using both clinical and radiographic information and serve as the reference standard, while two different experienced evaluators perform an assessment based on radiographic information only. The primary objective is to evaluate the agreement between dental students' self-assessments and the reference standard evaluation of endodontic treatment quality. Secondary objectives include assessment of agreement between radiographic-only and reference standard evaluations, as well as examination of whether assessment outcomes differ according to the rotary file system used across operator self-assessments and independent evaluations.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
201
No study-defined intervention; treatments were performed as part of routine clinical care.
School of Dentitry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Thessaloniki, Central Macedonia, Greece
Agreement between dental students' self-assessment and reference standard evaluation of endodontic treatment quality
The level of agreement between dental students' self-assessment of completed endodontic treatments and evaluations performed by two experienced evaluators with access to both clinical and radiographic information, considered the reference standard.
Time frame: Up to 2 weeks (at completion of endodontic treatment)
Agreement between radiographic-only evaluation and reference standard evaluation of endodontic treatment quality
The level of agreement between evaluations of endodontic treatments performed by two independent evaluators using radiographic information only and evaluations performed by two experienced evaluators with access to both clinical and radiographic information, considered the reference standard.
Time frame: Up to 2 weeks (at completion of endodontic treatment)
Proportion of self-reported assessment findings by rotary file system based on dental students' self-assessment
The proportion of specific findings reported in dental students' self-assessments of completed endodontic treatments, based on a structured self-assessment questionnaire, compared between two rotary file systems used as part of routine clinical practice. Results will be reported as percentages of self-reported findings for each rotary file system.
Time frame: Up to 2 weeks (at completion of endodontic treatment)
Proportion of reference standard evaluation findings by rotary file system
The proportion of specific evaluation findings identified by experienced evaluators using combined clinical and radiographic information, considered the reference standard, for completed endodontic treatments. The proportions of these evaluation findings will be compared between two rotary file systems used as part of routine clinical practice and reported as percentages for each system.
Time frame: Up to 2 weeks (at completion of endodontic treatment)
Proportion of radiographic-only evaluation findings by rotary file system
The proportion of specific evaluation findings identified through radiographic-only assessment of completed endodontic treatments. The proportions of these radiographic evaluation findings will be compared between two rotary file systems used as part of routine clinical practice and reported as percentages for each system.
Time frame: Up to 2 weeks (at completion of endodontic treatment)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.