The transition from inpatient care to the home setting is a critical phase for glycemic management, often associated with decreased adherence and deterioration of glycemic control. This multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring (RT-CGM) versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) treated with insulin during the post-discharge transitional period. A total of 160 eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the RT-CGM group or the SMBG group. Participants will wear RT-CGM intermittently (every 4 weeks) or perform SMBG for the 12-week intervention period. They will also visit the clinic at Week 12 and Week 24 for follow-up assessments.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
160
RT-CGM can provide real-time tracking of glucose levels, and offer glucose trend graphs and user-configurable low and high glucose alerts.
SMBG provides discrete, point-in-time capillary blood glucose measurements via fingerstick testing.
Shanghai 6th People's Hospital
Shanghai, China
Shanghai Fengxian District Central Hospital
Shanghai, China
Shanghai General Hospital
Shanghai, China
Shanghai Tongji Hospital
Shanghai, China
Difference between change in HbA1c between the intervention group and the control group at Week 12
HbA1c, expressed as %
Time frame: from baseline to Week 12
Difference between change in HbA1c between the intervention group and the control group at Week 24
HbA1c, expressed as %
Time frame: from baseline to Week 24
Difference in CGM Time in Range (TIR) (3.9-10.0 mmol/L) between the intervention group and the control group at Week 14 and Week 26
Percent
Time frame: at Week 14 and Week 26
Difference in CGM Time Above Range (TAR) (>10.0 mmol/L; >13.9 mmol/L) between the intervention group and the control group at Week 14 and Week 26
Percent
Time frame: at Week 14 and Week 26
Difference in CGM Time Below Range (TBR) (<3.9 mmol/L; <3.0 mmol/L) between the intervention group and the control group at Week 14 and Week 26
percent
Time frame: at Week 14 and Week 26
Difference in CGM coefficient of variation (CV) between the intervention group and the control group at Week 14 and Week 26
percent
Time frame: at Week 14 and Week 26
Difference between change in self-efficacy score between the intervention group and the control group at Week 12 and Week 24
Measured by Diabetes Management Self-efficacy Scale (DMSES) ;Total score ranges from 0 to 200 (0 to 10 per item across 20 items);Higher scores mean: A better outcome (indicating higher self-efficacy in managing diabetes).
Time frame: from baseline to Week 12 and Week 24
Difference between change in diabetes-related distress between the intervention group and the control group at Week 12 and Week 24
Measured by the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS);Total score ranges from 17 to 102 (1 to 6 per item across 17 items);Higher scores mean: A worse outcome (indicating higher levels of diabetes-related distress).
Time frame: from baseline to Week 12 and Week 24
Difference between change in glucose monitoring satisfaction between the intervention group and the control group at Week 12
Measured by the Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Scale (GMSS), Version: Type 2 Diabetes;Total score ranges from 15 to 75 (1 to 5 per item across 15 items);Higher scores mean: A better outcome (indicating higher satisfaction with glucose monitoring).
Time frame: from baseline to Week 12 and Week 24
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.