partial pulpotomy of mature molars with irrevesible pulptits using CGF in adolescents
partial pulpotomy of mature molars with irrevesible pulptits using CGF in adolescents form 12-17 years old versus endodontic treatment with a 2 years follow up
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
60
partial pulpotomy using CGF in irreversibly inflamed mature molars in adolescents
endodontic treatment using guttapercha in irreversibly inflamed molars in adolescents
Pediatric and Community Dentistry Department , Faculty of Dentistry , Minia University
Minya, Minia City, Egypt
The primary outcome was to compare the cumulative pain responses using modified VAS scores.
The primary outcome was to compare the cumulative pain responses using modified VAS scores which has a scale from 0 -10 after partial pulpotomy using CGF versus Endodontic treatment throughout one week of follow-up period.
Time frame: one week
Pulpal blood biomarkers
Measuring Biomarker levels via quantifying NKA, SP, IL-8, and MMP-8 in pg/ml blood after partial pulpotomy using CGF versus Endodontic treatment throughout one week of follow-up period
Time frame: one week
clinical follow up
Assess the absence of pain using VAS pain scale from 0-10
Time frame: one week
clinical follow up
assess absence or presence of sensitivity to percussion using gentile taping with the back of a metal dental mirror handle.
Time frame: one week
Radiographic follow up
assess the presence or absence of any signs of periapical radiolucency using parallel periapical radiographic dental x-rays using woodpecker digital sensor and its software with the Periapical Index (PAI) which has 5 scores ranging from 1-5 assessing the size of the periapical lesion after 1-, 3-, and 6-month 1 year and 2 years of follow-up
Time frame: 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.