Recurrent and hard-to-heal diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) represent a clinically challenging subgroup with delayed closure and frequent non-response to standard of care (SOC). Impaired local perfusion and superficial tissue hypoxia, commonly attributed to microcirculatory dysfunction, are proposed contributors to impaired wound-bed progression and prolonged healing trajectories in diabetes. Transcutaneous gaseous carbon dioxide (CO₂) therapy is a non-invasive adjunct intervention with a mechanistic rationale to modulate local microcirculation and tissue oxygenation; however, controlled clinical evidence in recurrent, hard-to-heal DFUs remains limited. This prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel-group clinical investigation compares transcutaneous CO₂ therapy plus SOC versus SOC alone over 4 weeks. The primary objective is to determine whether the proportion of completely healed DFUs at Week 4 differs between groups under a predefined healing confirmation procedure. Key secondary objectives include quantifying changes in superficial tissue oxygenation (StO₂) using hyperspectral imaging and assessing pain intensity (NPRS). Supportive outcomes include ulcer area reduction metrics and wound-bed appearance in unhealed.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
30
Participants in the intervention group received SOC alongside 20 sessions of CO₂ therapy. These 50-minute sessions were administered once daily on weekdays (Monday-Friday) over a 4-week period. CO₂ therapies were performed using the medical device. The participant's lower body was sealed in a single-use, biocompatible, medical-grade wrap. The wrap was filled with medical-grade CO₂ to a 99.9% concentration for a 50-minute session. After 50 minutes, CO₂ was pumped out and the wrap removed.
UMC Ljubljana
Ljubljana, Slovenia, Slovenia
complete ulcer healing
full epitelization without exudate confirmed at 2 consecutive exams
Time frame: 4 weeks
change in StO2
StO₂ (%) will be measured using Hyperspectral Imaging (by TIVITA HSI device) at baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4. The outcome is change from baseline in StO₂ (%). Higher values indicate better tissue oxygenation/perfusion.
Time frame: 4 weeks
change in pain intensity (NPRS)
Change from baseline in pain intensity assessed by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)Outcome Measure Description: Pain intensity will be self-reported using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), an 11-point scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst imaginable pain. The outcome is change from baseline in NPRS score at week 4.
Time frame: 4 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.