The primary objective of this clinical trial is to verify the superiority of a digital diagnosis and treatment system for the conservative management of knee sports injuries-based on wearable sensors, machine vision, and large language models-over conventional off-site rehabilitation in terms of functional outcomes. The secondary objectives include assessing safety and adverse events, compliance and feasibility, algorithm evaluation accuracy and usability, and generating clinical evidence to support the registration of a Class II medical device. Participants will undergo a six-month intervention comprising knee muscle strengthening exercises, lower limb balance and stability training, and stretching exercises. Follow-up assessments will be conducted every four weeks, recording IKDC and Lysholm subjective knee function scores, VAS pain scores, SF-36 quality of life scores, knee range of motion, and MRI findings.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
160
Wall Squats, Glute Bridges, Lunges, Crab Walks, Bulgarian Split Squats, Deadlifts, and similar exercises.
Single-leg balance stance, step-up/step-down, lower limb Y-balance single-leg stance training, lower limb single-leg stance star excursion balance training, quadruped position support, and similar exercises.
After each training session, you can perform muscle stretching or use methods such as resistance band exercises or foam roller rolling for muscle relaxation.
Beijing Jishuitan Hospital
Beijing, China
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Beijing, China
Peking University People's Hospital
Beijing, China
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, China
International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form Score
The scoring dimensions (18 items in total) include: Symptoms (7 items): pain frequency, pain at rest, pain during activity, swelling, joint locking, sensation of joint instability. Activities of daily living (9 items): walking, ascending and descending stairs, kneeling, squatting, rising from a seated position, running, jumping, turning, and sudden stopping ability. Sports participation (2 items): comparison of current sports activity level with pre-injury level. Scoring rules: each item corresponds to a score (0-4 points or 0-10 points), and the total score is standardized to a 0-100 scale. A higher score indicates better function (100 points = no limitations whatsoever).
Time frame: week0、week4、week8、week12、week24
Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale
Scoring Dimensions (8 items in total): Limping (5 points) Need for support (5 points) Joint locking (15 points) Joint instability (25 points) Pain (25 points) Swelling (10 points) Ascending and descending stairs (10 points) Squatting (5 points) Scoring Rules: The total score ranges from 0 to 100 points, with the score corresponding to functional levels as follows: ≥95 points: Excellent 84-94 points: Good 65-83 points: Fair \<65 points: Poor
Time frame: week0、week4、week8、week12、week24
Visual Analogue Scale
VAS is a commonly used subjective pain assessment tool. In this study, patients were asked to use the VAS score at different follow-up time points to subjectively evaluate the average pain intensity in their affected shoulder. The VAS scoring method involves drawing a 10 cm horizontal line on paper. One end of the line is marked as 0, indicating no pain, while the other end is marked as 10, indicating severe pain. The middle sections represent varying degrees of pain. Patients are instructed to mark a point on the line based on their self-perceived level of pain.
Time frame: week0、week4、week8、week12、week24
36-Item Short Form Health Survey
The SF-36 Quality of Life Score assesses both physical health (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health) and mental health (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, mental health) across eight dimensions through 36 questions. Each dimension is standardized to a score ranging from 0 to 100 points and can be summarized into two composite scores: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Time frame: week0、week4、week8、week12、week24
Knee Range of Motion
Testing Instrument: A plastic Baseline® goniometer (Model 12-100, New York, NY, USA) was used. Testing Method:Knee flexion and extension range of motion (ROM) were measured with the patient in the supine position, pelvis stabilized, and hip in neutral alignment (0° flexion/extension). For knee flexion, the thigh was fixed while the lower leg was actively or passively moved toward the buttocks in the sagittal plane, and the maximum flexion angle was recorded. For knee extension, the heel was elevated to lift the thigh off the surface, and the ability to achieve full extension (0°) or hyperextension was measured.A goniometer was used with its stationary arm aligned along the femoral shaft, movable arm along the tibial shaft, and axis placed at the lateral femoral condyle. To ensure accuracy, each ROM parameter was measured three times, and the average value was used for final analysis. All measurements were performed by trained professionals following standardized protocols.
Time frame: week0、week4、week8、week12、week24
Knee MRI
A 3.0T magnetic resonance scanner (Siemens Healthineers) was used for knee joint scanning. Professional radiologists, who were blinded to group assignments, performed MRI examinations of the affected knee joints. Routine sequences included axial PD fat-suppressed sequences, oblique coronal T1WI and T2WI fat-suppressed sequences, and oblique sagittal PD fat-suppressed sequences. The knee positions of all patients were standardized. Two radiologists, each with five years of experience in MRI analysis, reviewed the acquired MRI images. They were blinded to the patients' diagnoses and were not involved in the treatment process.
Time frame: week0、week4、week12、week24
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.